Aquifers in Alluvial Sediment .


41 views
Uploaded on:
Description
Ocean versus Shut Basin as Drainage Destination for Alluvial Sediments. SeaSuspended stack conceivably removedSalts potentially removedSea level change essential. Shut BasinFine-grained seds in systemSalts remainIsolated from impacts of ocean level changeAffected by neighborhood atmosphere. . . Alluvial aquifers in cold stores.
Transcripts
Slide 1

Aquifers in Alluvial Sediment Unconsolidated sands and rock saved by streams. Must be sufficiently extensive to deliver huge rates and volumes of water from wells River valley depleting glaciated territory Fault limited bowls Partially analyzed alluvial plain (High Plains) Mississippi embayment

Slide 2

Sea versus Shut Basin as Drainage Destination for Alluvial Sediments Sea Suspended load perhaps expelled Salts potentially evacuated Sea level change critical Closed Basin Fine-grained seds in framework Salts stay Isolated from impacts of ocean level change Affected by neighborhood atmosphere

Slide 4

Alluvial aquifers in icy stores

Slide 5

Large Glacial Lakes

Slide 6

Alluvial residue in glaciated zones Glaciers propel, scour seds., alter waterway course. Sed comp. relies on upon area/source material. Substantial scope of grn size. Till=clay-rock underneath ice sheet. Ocean level drops as ice advances. Water powered inclination increment. Disintegration, speed, conveying limit increment. Valleys chiseled into bedrock, more seasoned frigid silt (cover prior channel stores) Glaciers retreat. Release increments. Disintegration. Plaited streams, extensive silt limit. Outwash plain (sands and rock). Lakes before subsiding ice sheets. Lacustrine=clay-residue (varved)

Slide 7

Alluvial silt in glaciated territories, Cont Sea level ascents, icy masses subside, water driven angle decreases, release reduces, conveying limit drops. Style changes from plaited to wandering. Lakes. Coarse-grn seds stored in etched valleys. Rock on base, fining upward. Thickness relies on upon conditions amid/taking after glaciation. Icy landforms Region changes with interglacial. Release diminishes. Dregs adjusted. Vital materials: Till, lacustrine, outwash, alluvial valley fill, diamicton, float. Complex facies conveyances

Slide 11

Gravel focal point inside a silty-mud till

Slide 12

AlluvialAquifer Systems Geometry Aquifer sort Properties Recharge/Discharge Flow design Chemistry Examples

Slide 13

1:100 Geometry Channel stores Elongate, unthinkable bodies, twisted Length: numerous km Width: 0.1-a few km Thickness: 0.01-0.1 km Outwash stores, alluvial plain planar sheets 10s km evenly Thickness: 0.01-0.1 km 1:10

Slide 14

Aquifer Types Unconfined Confined Both, unconfined with nearby restricting unit Deposits Channel fill in advanced valley Buried channel Outwash plain Alluvial plain

Slide 15

Confining unit where fine grained Sand and rock, Primary aquifer Idealized setting Channel fill in current valley substratum

Slide 17

Hydraulic conductivity of some major alluvial aquifers

Slide 18

Storativity of major alluvial aquifers bound unconfined

Slide 19

Fining upward groupings in major alluvial aquifers Estimate how K fluctuates with profundity in alluvial aquifers? Straight line on log*log plot d 50 =C*Z b Log(20)- Log(3)=0.82 b=Slope=2/0.82=2.4 d 50 =C*Z 2.4 Hazen technique K=C 1 d 10 2 Alluvial: K=C 2 Z 4.8

Slide 20

Infiltration through floodplain Losing stream including tributary Stormflow off uplands Recharge to alluvial aquifers

Slide 21

Irrigation return stream Rise in waterway arrange, Bank stockpiling Rise in stream organize, Flood

Slide 22

Discharge from cellar Main channel losing because of pumping

Slide 23

Discharges from Alluvial Aquifers To fundamental channel or tributaries Lakes on floodplain Wetlands Wells

Slide 24

Streambed conductance impacts on gw/sw communication Fine-grained seds on streambed Fine-grained seds in topstratum

Slide 25

10 Stream-parallel stream, Neither pick up nor lose 9 Losing achieve 10 9 Gaining losing Gaining achieve Preliminary elucidations of gw-sw collaborations utilizing head shapes 10 9 10 2. 3. 9 1. 4 .

Slide 27

Draw a Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model of Alluvial Aquifers

Slide 28

Some cases Fox-Wolf River Basin, WI. Outwash Corning aquifer, NY. Waterway valley Andruscoggin. ME. Alluvial valley once immersed via seawater Irondogenese, NY, Alluvial valley once loaded with new water lake Others

Slide 29

Wisconsin Dome

Slide 30

140 miles 20 miles Fox-Wolf River Basin

Slide 31

Buried pre-cold valley, now secured by till and lacustrine stores

Slide 32

What does this guide educate you regarding the Fox-Wolf River aquifer? Provincial GW stream designs? Where are thr energize and release zones? What controls? Expected fluxes? GW release zone? 30 miles

Slide 34

Baseflow rate identified with T of surficial aquifer Composition of GW and SW comparative

Slide 35

Ground water move through surficial aquifer, Paleozoic sandstones, and release to waterway

Slide 36

Flow-through lake

Slide 39

Another major outwash store

Slide 41

Conceptual Model Recharge Streams Cape Cod Bay Fine-grained Sand/Silt Groundwater Flow Paths Saline Groundwater Bedrock Glacial Till Freshwater/Saltwater Interface South North

Slide 44

Chemung stream valley, Corning, NY Limestone and shale bedrock on adjusted slopes 800 ft or more over the sand and rock aquifer on the valley floor.

Slide 45

1 mile 5 miles

Slide 47

4000 1:40 angle proportion

Slide 50

A. Corning Aquifer Exercise 3000 ft Determine the level head slope at every area Estimate the ground water fluxes at every area Estimate the normal stream speeds Estimate the volumetric rate per unit length of waterway that the aquifer is adding to the streams at every area. Give a clarification to the contrasts between the two areas B.

Slide 51

Water Balance Info given in GW Atlas ET=0.5 P 0.6Recharge is from uplands What is the aggregate baseflow flux to streams? Water Balance from Conceptual Model Recharge = Infiltration + Upland Runoff I=0.5P UR=0.6Re Re=0.5P+0.6Re Re=1.25P From guide, P = 40 inch/yr, so Re=50 in/yr

Slide 52

Hardness = 2.5 Ca(mg/l) + 4.1 Mg(mg/l) <60 mg/l = delicate >150 mg/l = hard Water is magnesium bicarbonate sort. Take note of the hardness. The district is underlain by limestone and shale

Slide 53

16 Mgpd

Slide 54

Fine-grained marine residue underlie cold outwash in the Little Androscoggin aquifer in Maine.

Slide 55

Glacial valley somewhat immersed by the ocean

Slide 57

5000 ft

Slide 59

Water Balance Info given in GW Atlas P=43 in/yr, ET=23 in/yr (0.53), Ru=20in/yr (0.46) Also given: Recharge as penetration more than 16 mi2 aquifer represents 16.4 cfs, overland from uplands 11.2 cfs, from waterway 1.4 cfs. 29 cfs add up to Re to aquifer Area of aquifer = 16 mi2 Are these steady? Exhibit with water equalizations. Ru=Baseflow+Storm=Recharge+Storm Total Recharge=baseflow= 29 cfs: more than 16 mi2= 24 in/yr 20 in/yr= 24 in/yr+Stormflow, Negative stormflow?? Issue Watershed Balance: P+OU=ET+Ru not the same as above Aquifer: Infilt+OU+RiverLoss=Baseflow Infiltration = 16.4 cfs; change over to flux over aquifer: 14 in/yr Overland from Upland= 11.2 cfs; 9 in/yr Total Recharge=baseflow= 29 cfs: 24 in/yr Ru=P+OU-ET=43+9-23=29 in/yr not the same as above Ru=Base+Storm, So, stormflow must be 5 in/yr; as a rule, the water flux values appear to be conflicting. Continuously make certain your water parities can be shut.

Slide 60

Hydraulic head in frosty outwash, Little Androscoggin Aquifer, Maine

Slide 61

7 Mgpd creation

Slide 62

4 miles Aquifer filling a valley once possessed by new water cold lake

Slide 63

Structural Contours on Bedrock

Slide 66

4.3 Mgpd

Slide 68

Corning Aquifer. Ca, Mg, HCO3; Hardness: 225 ppm; TDS: 212 ppm 16 Mgpd Little Androscoggin, Na, K, Ca, HCO3; Hardness: 24-68ppm TDS 67-128 ppm alluvium bedrock Irondogenesee Aquifer, Ca, Na, HCO3, Cl, SO4; TDS 665, Hardness: 373 4 Mgpd

Slide 70

Some other alluvial aquifers

Slide 71

Relative sizes of case alluvial aquifers 100 miles

Slide 73

Dissolution of basic evaporites shapes profound troughs in Pecos River Basin

Slide 75

80 Mgpd Water Quality: 1000+ mg/L basic because of fundamental evaporites and energize from saline surface water and water system return stream where vanishing has expanded salt substance

Slide 76

Water Quality Summary TDS Hardness Major particles

Recommended
View more...