Change and Responsibility QUALITY Evaluation IN DUTCH Colleges.


62 views
Uploaded on:
Description
Change and Responsibility QUALITY Appraisal IN DUTCH Colleges. Ton Vroeijenstijn Relationship of Colleges in the Netherlands. VSNU. Qualities 'DUTCH MODEL '. Colleges in charge of value and QA VSNU follows up for the benefit of the colleges
Transcripts
Slide 1

Change & ACCOUNTABILITY QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN DUTCH UNIVERSITIES Ton Vroeijenstijn Association of Universities in the Netherlands VSNU

Slide 2

CHARACTERISTICS ‘DUTCH MODEL ’ Universities in charge of value and QA VSNU follows up for the benefit of the colleges outer legitimization by part inspectorate across the country similar project arranged covers all projects patterned self assessment + outside appraisal open report no immediate connection with financing VSNU

Slide 3

PLAYERS IN THE GAME Universities and the VSNU inspectorate Minister of Education, Culture & Science parliament superintendents understudies VSNU

Slide 4

DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES QUALITY ASSESSMENT Inspectorate Minister Meta-assessment Evaluation subsequent VSNU Departments Universities

Slide 6

Purpose of appraisal Internal capacity: Quality affirmation Improvement seat stamping self regulation External capacity: Accountability understanding into quality knowledge into differences lobby mark for quality VSNU

Slide 7

BASIC ELEMENTS self appraisal outside audit open report keep an eye on evaluation by inspectorate mind follow up by inspectorate VSNU

Slide 8

Quality pointers 1 Goals and points the system the showing\'s association/learning procedure last theory/research task pass rates/dropout Student directing and prompt VSNU

Slide 9

Quality pointers 2 Feasibility of the project Qualifications of the staff Facilities outside contacts Internal quality certification global measurement the graduate VSNU

Slide 10

THE PROCESS Formal declaration self evaluation by the office site visit master board of trustees open report meta-assessment by inspectorate in the long run “yellow cards” beware of follow up following 2 years VSNU

Slide 11

THE SELF EVALUATION is illustrative as well as explanatory and basic searches for how to take care of issues it is never a PR record VSNU

Slide 12

COMPOSITION OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE Experts in the field work market nonnatives educationalist understudy VSNU

Slide 13

FUNCTIONS OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE Consultant quality change input to the workforce dialog with the personnel motivating force for inward quality administration Accountant/controller legitimisation inside quality administration responsibility VSNU

Slide 14

THE SYSTEM OF EQA IN THE YEAR 2000 Improvement & responsibility Diversity rather than consistency How to make quality more noticeable? Accreditation or not? More adaptability and tailor made evaluations The universal measurement of EQA

Slide 15

.

Recommended
View more...