Composing Standards-Based IEPs for Students with Significant Disabilities .

Uploaded on:
Center. Moving to concentrate on scholarly standardsRole of useful abilities instructionLinkage to review level contentAlternate arrangements of evaluation level materialsDeveloping objectives and goals. . . Changing ExpectationsChanging PracticesChanging Outcomes. Educational modules Access
Slide 1

Composing Standards-Based IEPs for Students with Significant Disabilities August, 2008

Slide 2

Focus Shifting to concentrate on scholastic gauges Role of useful aptitudes direction Linkage to review level substance Alternate arrangements of review level materials Developing objectives and destinations

Slide 3

Curriculum Access – Students with Significant Disabilities Changing Expectations Changing Practices Changing Outcomes Shifts Happen…

Slide 4

Students with Significant Disabilities require broad backings to take part in normal day by day exercises likely require continuous support in adulthood complex needs in regions, for example, correspondence, human services, conduct bolster, expertise securing (e.g., scholarly, self improvement, social, professional), and speculation may encounter tactile shortfalls and engine challenges which require focused on mediations to bolster their cooperation in schedules and exercises

Slide 5

Federal law → Impact on practices IDEA 04 access to the general training educational modules raised desires for all through testing scholastic guidelines utilization of substitute appraisal adjusted to scholastic substance principles at level NCLB interchange evaluations for understudies with huge handicaps adjusted to level substance responsibility

Slide 6


Slide 8

1960\'s – Institutionalization 1970\'s – Deinstitutionalization Movement 1990\'s – Inclusive Education Developmental Curriculum Functional Curriculum Academic Content Browder History of Curriculum for Students with Severe Disabilities University of Kentucky - NAAC

Slide 9

Students with Significant Disabilities New desires… huge movements! Establishment Skills Content Standards Benchmarks Grade Level Expectations

Slide 10

Foundation Skills 1. correspondence 2. critical thinking 3. asset get to and usage 4. connecting and creating learning 5. citizenship

Slide 11

What about the Unique Needs of Students with Disabilities ? IEP Must address general training educational programs Must address some other needs that outcome from an understudy\'s handicap Individualization is perceived and required

Slide 12

"Shouldn\'t something be said about useful abilities? Understudies with most huge subjective incapacities ought to: Address practical abilities through the IEP Embed inside scholastic and normal day by day schedules Assess by means of classroom guideline, not LAA1

Slide 13

Students with most noteworthy intellectual inabilities ought to: Be shown scholarly substance since it is "utilitarian" and socially substantial Not need to hold up until they can make a bed before they are educated to peruse or before they are shown writing Be assumed able and not denied direction offered to understudies of a similar age (review level substance models and educational modules) Adapted from National Alternate Achievement Center,

Slide 14

Proposed LAA1 Participation Criteria Evidence of a Significant Cognitive Disability (at least 3 Standard Deviations beneath the mean) Criterion #1 Instructional Needs and Curricular Alignment (adjusted to Extended Standards) Criterion #2 Criterion #3 Student Safeguards

Slide 15

Louisiana Extended Standards in light of benchmarks and GLEs ELA, arithmetic, and science catch the pith of the GLEs center scholastic substance that might be surveyed at every review traverse (3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-12)

Slide 16

Extended Standards explain scholarly gaining starting with one review then onto the next encourage access to review level substance move from the solid to the dynamic take care of essential aptitudes and understandings

Slide 17

Complexity Levels Three multifaceted nature levels for each broadened standard. Portrayals of changing chances to get to the scholastic substance distinguished by the broadened standard

Slide 18

Level 1 least complex; mirrors an understudy\'s underlying encounter with substance identified with the amplified standard. Level 2 a more perplexing utilization of the broadened standards. Level 3 even more perplexing learning circumstances (e.g., comprehension and resulting processing of discourse, content, and hidden content structure.) Mastery of an amplified standard by and large demonstrated by an understudy performing at level 3.

Slide 19

Grades 3-4 English Language Arts

Slide 20

5-6 Grade English Language Arts

Slide 21

Grades 7-8 English Language Arts

Slide 22

9-12 Grade English Language Arts

Slide 24

LAA1 Spring 2009 Performance Task Samples Parent leaflet Who, what, when, where, how

Slide 25

Implications for Students Access to the wide broad training educational modules, not simply the Extended Standards The Extended Standards don\'t constitute a different educational programs Address an assortment of GLEs at level Partial interest Curriculum content increments in multifaceted nature over time Change/development after some time

Slide 26

Implications for understudies Address extension and arrangement At suitable unpredictability level Use level instructional materials in proper interchange formats Accessible instructional materials Taught utilitarian abilities as determined by the IEP groups rehearse aptitudes inside the setting of general training scholarly schedules

Slide 27

Essential Issues These are ideas and practices which have been explored and observed to be successful and basic components of an understudy\'s training program.

Slide 28

Essential Issues Ability to contribute Age-fittingness Assistive innovation Friendships Future-arranged Generalization Inclusion

Slide 29

Essential Issues (proceeded with) Partial interest Positive behavioral bolster Self-assurance Student pride Student inclinations

Slide 30

Middle and High School Considerations Community Access Vocational Training/Employment

Slide 31

Literacy Access for Students with Significant Disabilities

Slide 32

Reading: Lack of Knowledge in regards to Students with Significant Disabilities Lack of concentrate on perusing for this populace In the most recent 20 years while the "investigation of perusing" has been building up, the concentration in serious inabilities has been useful life aptitudes (Browder) Limited look into Unknown conceivable outcomes Next venture to apply what is known from the "science of perusing" to grow intense, longitudinal perusing interventions (Browder)

Slide 33

The Opportunity to Learn Reading Because… Students "potential" to gain ground is obscure without the chance to learn Students who are not crippled are not required to ace all life abilities before getting the chance to figure out how to peruse Academic guideline for understudies who are nondisabled does not end at the primary indication of "no advance" Reading is a "urgent expertise" that can improve grown-up results; perusing is utilitarian Even if understudies don\'t get to be distinctly proficient, the procurement of early education aptitudes can open chances to appreciate and advantage from an extensive variety of age and grade proper writing Browder, Diane M. & Jimenez, Bree

Slide 34

Literacy: General Consideration Teaching to instructional level Emergent education Using age proper writing and exercises

Slide 35

Instructional Level: Emergent Literacy Between birth and when youngster figures out how to peruse Based on conviction that from most punctual improvement kids are in procedure of getting to be distinctly proficient Strong accentuation on correspondence Diane M. Browder, Ph.D. & Bree Jimenez, M.Ed.

Slide 36

Approaches to Literacy for Students with Disabilities "Status" demonstrate taking after same movement as all youngsters Many not able to ace essentials so proficiency slowed down Functional model May learn locate words however not sum up for importance; some couldn\'t learn locate words Promoting rising education Access for each tyke Diane M. Browder, Ph.D. & Bree Jimenez, M.Ed

Slide 37

Early Stages of Literacy Development Early Emergent Literacy Learn that books have stories; enthusiasm for print; figure out how to handle books; jot Emergent Literacy Begin to comprehend that content/pictures pass on significance; read a few words; may compose letters Developing Literacy Phonemic mindfulness; translate words; appreciate picture books; locate vocabulary; create sentence Early Independent Literacy Begin to peruse for premium or data; compose claim thoughts; answer inquiries regarding content Diane M. Browder, PhD & Bree Jimenez, MEd

Slide 38

Providing Accessible Instructional Materials (AIM) Linked to review level substance Alternate organization coordinated to understudy adapting needs Routine instructional practice

Slide 39

IDEA Section 300.172 Accessible Instructional Materials Provisions inside the IDEA 04 require that course books and related center instructional materials be furnished to understudies with print inabilities in particular arrangements in an auspicious way Joy Zabala, Closing the Gap Conference, 2007.

Slide 40

AIMS: Key terms National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS) NIMAS Center – national archive Chafee Amendment Print incapacity Organic brokenness

Slide 41

For additional data on available instructional materials: LA-AIM Website LA Department of Education web National AIM Consortium Web

Slide 42

What are "Center Instructional Materials"? Printed course readings and related printed center materials distributed with the writings Written and distributed basically for use in rudimentary and optional school guideline Required by state training organization or nearby instruction office for use by understudies in the classroom Joy Zabala, Closing the Gap Conference, 2007.

Slide 43

What are "Specific Formats"? Braille Audio Digital content Large print Joy Zabala, Closi

View more...