Connecting with Community Stakeholders and Building Community Partnerships .

Uploaded on:
Category: Funny / Jokes
2. Why Stakeholder Involvement is Critical. The tyke welfare framework is much bigger than the general population tyke welfare agency.No single office can satisfy the obligation of keeping youngsters safe, in perpetual homes, and accomplishing admirably being.The objective is to engage partners so that the whole group takes tyke insurance as its obligation..
Slide 1

Drawing in Community Stakeholders and Building Community Partnerships The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement

Slide 2

Why Stakeholder Involvement is Critical The youngster welfare framework is much bigger than the general population kid welfare office. No single office can satisfy the duty of guarding kids, in lasting homes, and accomplishing prosperity. The objective is to engage partners so that the whole group takes kid security as its duty.

Slide 3

Why Stakeholder Involvement is Critical (kept) Partnering with group partners makes a voting public for youngster welfare, so that when the office needs bolster it gets it (for instance, enactment, funds, regard even in the reality of a kid harm or demise). Associations likewise reinforce group partners.

Slide 4

Successful Stakeholder Involvement Means: Collaboration and organizations as a lifestyle for general society kid welfare office, not only for the Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) and the IV-B Child and Family Services Plan (CFSP).

Slide 5

Stakeholder Involvement in CAPTA Chafee Title IV-B CFSR

Slide 6

Successful Stakeholder Involvement is Achieved by : Gathering contribution from partners Including partners in basic leadership Giving input to partners Continuous correspondence Making partner inclusion an indispensable piece of organization operations Practicing genuine "coordinated effort", not "cloberation"

Slide 7

Who are Potential Stakeholders? Inside to the kid welfare office External

Slide 8

Levels of Community Partnerships Basic, successful referrals of families for different administrations (case level). Joint case arranging with other specialist organizations, the family, and the family\'s system (case level). Joint program advancement to make required new projects and administrations (moderate level).

Slide 9

Levels of Community Partnerships (proceeded with) Shared authoritative foundation—composed understandings for data sharing, joint administration data frameworks, staff contact positions, finding staff in another office, and so forth (middle of the road level). Making a Stakeholder Collaborative for Child Protection in a locale, with its own particular administration. Making a State-Level Stakeholder Collaborative, or Cabinet for Children, Youth, and Family Services.

Slide 10

Culture Shift: The State Public Child Welfare Agency Not the sole supplier of youngster welfare administrations Leadership: impetus and coordinator for a group based framework Retains lawful duties regarding assurance of particular kids

Slide 11

Culture Shift: Community Partners More joint effort among already independent funders and organizations Renegotiation of parts and obligations

Slide 12

Promising Practices in Community Partnerships Mental Health Systems of Care Child Welfare Systems of Care Quality Review Processes (CQI/Case Reviews) LAN 29

Slide 13

Mental Health Systems of Care Comprehensive administration cluster Coordinated Community based Child focused Individualized for the family Culturally skilled Family determined Early distinguishing proof and mediation

Slide 14

Child Welfare Systems of Care Tbd in Dec.

Slide 15

LAN 29 Collaborative coordinates conventional and non-customary administrations/bolsters Membership open to all Governance structure chose by individuals Implements Wraparound approach QUEST – serving DCFS families Strong results

Slide 16

Child Welfare Quality Improvement Peer Network (supported by the National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement) QI parts include: Review cases (read, meet, talk about, evaluate) Review frameworks level information and reports Make suggestions Contribute to composed reports Dissemination of discoveries, e.g., presentations to different partners

Slide 17

QI Peer Network (cont1) Examples of continuous issues and techniques Ongoing structures for significant cooperation QI, non-permanent parent and youth chambers (Illinois, Kentucky) Citizen Review Panels required on the off chance that audits (Idaho, New Hampshire) Preparation and bolster Training (Idaho trains semi-yearly because of turnover ) Whose meeting: making QI important to partners by concentrating on their issues, points of view and include them in setting plans and critical thinking, not simply listening to data (Illinois)

Slide 18

QI Peer Network (cont2) Other strategies for information Child welfare goes to particular crowd gatherings (non-permanent parents and youth) and accumulates data to convey to CQI boards (Hawaii) Targeted overviews - to particular partner bunches on particular issues. E.g., Kentucky has studied in regards to: CW/Court associations Service exhibit appraisal Youth administrations Fatherhood administrations Family group gatherings

Slide 19

QI Methods to Share Information: Wisconsin\'s PEP site Stakeholders get to site for the four program improvement arrange (PEP) work bunches (appropriation, case process, QI, and Out-of-Home Care) to audit approach activities, make inquiries, remark and read others\' remarks, inquiries and answers

Slide 20

CFSR: Collaboration with Community Stakeholders Principles Partners Processes State cases

Slide 21

CFSR Collaboration Principles Shared obligation Partnerships Family focused and group based Purposes, objectives, time and exertion

Slide 22

CFSR Partners Children\'s Bureau Resource Guide, p 2 Court Tribal Youth Child welfare organization staff External accomplices Diversity-of-state agents Other

Slide 23

CFSR Collaborative Processes Children\'s Bureau Resource Guide, p 2 Common objective Benefit to all gatherings Vehicle for teaming up Ability to come to agreement Strong authority Meaningful inclusion Shared achievement Engage new accomplices Shared vision for the future Ongoing assessment

Slide 24

Engaging Collaborative Partners Children\'s Bureau Resource Guide, p 5 Continually advancing CFSR Match particular partners to forms Statewide appraisal Onsite survey PIP advancement PIP execution Targeted exceed through compelling channels With every partner: Review points of interest of CFSR and PIP coordinated effort Jointly evaluate commitments, time duty and assets Explore how to support contribution With partner aggregate Establish "standards of engagement" Communicate courses of events for all exercises and items

Slide 25

Using the CFSR to Build Partnerships Children\'s Bureau Resource Guide, p 6 Existing joint efforts Volunteers Allocate kid welfare assets and time Communication vehicles

Slide 26

Finding Evidence of Strong Collaboration: Nine Elements Children\'s Bureau Resource Guide, p 8 Engagement of Other Partners Communication Needs evaluation Joint vital arranging Sharing of assets and basic changes Sustainability Policies, laws, directions Research/information/assessment Leadership

Slide 27

Finding Evidence of Strong Collaboration: An Exercise Children\'s Bureau Resource Guide, pp 8 - 10 You are in one of four "component" bunches: Engagement of different accomplices Communication Needs evaluation Sustainability Read your component from the CB Guide Discuss cases from your state Brainstorm different cases List best cases so your gathering can report out

Slide 28

Critiquing Collaborative Efforts Read your Case Study (1, 2 or 3) Select individuals to Take notes on Hand Out #9 Report an abstract of your case amid entire Report your answers from HO 9 amid whole In gathering, talk about every question and take notes In entire, report out Synopsis of case Answers to inquiries on Hand Out #9

Slide 29

Your State\'s Previous CFSR: Involving Stakeholders Identifying and enrolling Preparing them for and managing inclusion + and – of the procedures According to partners Your appraisal Ongoing contribution? Same gatherings? Partners required in other kid welfare office work?

Slide 30

Agency Partners Eco-outline extra accomplices ought to be included?

Slide 31

Stakeholder Engagement Plan: How, Who, When Greens – Keeping positive association Yellows – Improving connections and upgrading contribution Reds – Healing and re-including No Dot – Developing relationship and starting inclusion

Slide 32

Overall Strategy: Reflection and Planning What was the general procedure for the past CFSR? What ought to be the general procedure for the second CFSR?

Slide 33

Planning Stakeholder Involvement at Each Phase of The CFSR Statewide Assessment Onsite Review Program Improvement Planning PIP Implementation PIP Monitoring/Revisions

Slide 34

Planning Stakeholder Involvement for CFSR Outcomes and Systemic Factors Outcomes Safety (2), Permanency (2), Well-being (3) Systemic Factors Statewide Information System Case Review System Quality Assurance System Staff and Provider Training Service Array Agency Responsiveness to the Community Foster and Adoptive Parent Licensing, Recruitment, and Retention

Slide 35

Plans to Monitor Stakeholder Involvement and for Continuous Communication Overall partners inclusion Stakeholder association re the seven results and seven systemic variables Preparing for the Next Review Reviewing drafts of Statewide Assessment and PIP

Slide 36

Wrap Up No single organization, including people in general kid welfare framework, can satisfy the obligation of guarding kids, in lasting homes, and accomplishing prosperity. Group cooperation of a full scope of included and conferred partners is the best seek and technique after this.

View more...