Detroit Details City.


198 views
Uploaded on:
Description
Detroit Details City. Math Demonstrating Motown's Music. Nicola Grissom Steve Mahler Becky Trisko. Targets. To rate likenesses between chose melodies of Southeast Michigan's homegrown craftsmen
Transcripts
Slide 1

Detroit Stats City Math Modeling Motown’s Music Nicola Grissom Steve Mahler Becky Trisko

Slide 2

Objectives To rate similitudes between chose melodies of Southeast Michigan’s homegrown craftsmen To add to a model precisely depicting the fundamental measurements utilized by tune raters as a part of rating likenesses between tunes

Slide 3

Artists and Songs Madonna: Express Yourself Kid Rock: American Badass

Slide 4

Artists and Songs Iggy Pop: Search & Destroy Eminem: Without Me

Slide 5

Artists and Songs The White Stripes: Hotel Yorba The Supremes: Stop in the Name of Love

Slide 6

Artists and Songs Aaliyah: We Need a Resolution Marvin Gaye: Let’s Get it On

Slide 7

Artists and Songs The Temptations: Get Ready Derrick May: Strings of Life

Slide 8

Artists and Songs Alice Cooper: School’s Out Forever Ted Nugent: Cat Scratch Fever

Slide 9

Methods Each Song was appraised on a 21 point Likert scale on closeness with one another tune Following evaluations, subjects evaluated every tune on the accompanying elements (7 point Likert Scale) “Danceability” “Singability” “Popularity When Released” “Appeal to Males” “Appeal to Females” “Appeal to You”

Slide 10

Methods what\'s more, the accompanying target files were gathered on the tunes: Sex of Performer Year Song was Released Top Billboard Chart Position Style of Music And on their raters: Sex of Rater Age of Rater

Slide 11

0.215 0.21 0.205 0.2 Stress 0.195 0.19 0.185 0.18 0.175 0.17 1 2 3 4 5 Dimensions Scree Plot Elbow

Slide 12

2.0 tkno 1.5 mnm 1.0 aaa distraught .5 kr 0.0 spms ip tn air conditioning tptns - .5 mg - 1.0 ws - 1.5 - 1.5 - 1.0 - .5 0.0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Dimension 1 MDS Euclidean separation model

Slide 13

.9 .8 .7 .6 4 .5 3 2 .4 1 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 Dimension 1 INDSCAL Derived Subject Weights

Slide 14

Dim 1 Dim 2 Danceability .06 -.18 Singability .09 -.15 Popularity When Released .08 -.15 Appeal to Males .12 -.17 Appeal to Females .09 -.24 Appeal to You .08 -.18 Year Song was Released -.23 .43 Top Billboard Chart Position -.25 .27 Dimensional? On the off chance that the tunes were evaluated on ceaseless measurements, the separation of a tune from the inception on a measurement ought to connect with a free measure of that song’s position on that measurement. Connections between\'s MDS-Derived Dimension Scores and Subject-Rated Dimensions

Slide 15

Dimensions? None of the goal or subject-appraised qualities we quantified accounted well for the measurements mapped by MDS. Likewise, positioning the melodies taking into account these qualities did not well portray the putative measurements mapped by MDS.

Slide 16

White Stripes Madonna Aaliyah Supremes Marvin Gaye Temptations Eminem Derrick May Kid Rock Iggy Pop Alice Cooper Ted Nugent Tree Model Group 1 Group 2

Slide 17

Singability 6 5 4 Group 1 Group 2 3 2 t = 4.18, p < 0.005 1 0 t = 4.14, p < 0.005 Mean Appeal to Females in Tree Structure Groups Appeal to Females r = .91

Slide 18

Conclusion Although we initially speculated that the subjects would utilize measurements in rating closeness between melodies, our information was all the more properly demonstrated by a various leveled tree structure. Subjects appeared to sort melodies by classification and maybe sing

Recommended
View more...