Globally Similar General Inability Measures.


79 views
Uploaded on:
Description
September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Coordinating Purpose with Concept. Keeping in mind the end goal to address this reason, we have to begin by distinguishing persons ...
Transcripts
Slide 1

Universally Comparable General Disability Measures Barbara M. Altman National Center for Health Statistics U.S.A. September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 2

Session Objective Explain how the inquiries were created Understand the constrained decisions connected with creating registration questions Understand the item that outcomes from the inquiry set September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 3

Key Components Involved in Development of Questions Purpose of information gathering in a statistics setting Conceptual areas applicable to the estimation reason Operationalization of spaces to give estimation devices September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 4

Selection of reason/s 3 noteworthy classes of purposes at total level Service Provision Monitoring working in the populace Assess evening out of chances 2 criteria for choice of a reason Relevance Feasibility September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 5

Purpose: Service arrangement Seeks to distinguish those with particular needs, as a rule the most significant issues Requires itemized data about the individual and the earth Influenced by the association and structure of administration associations inside a specific society September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 6

Purpose: Monitoring working in the populace Seeks to recognize every one of those with movement or cooperation impediment Response likeness dangerous since support is socially and naturally decided Population reporting work confinement September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 7

Purpose: Equalization of chances Seeks to recognize each one of those at more serious danger than the all inclusive community for constraints in action or investment Disability as a demographic % Employed September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 8

Selecting Primary Purpose All 3 intentions were acknowledged as substantial Equalization of chance was distinguished as the main role of concern Decision made to create inquiries to meet this reason Monitoring the level of working was seen as an auxiliary reason September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 9

Source of Concepts for Measurement: ICF Model Health Condition (issue or illness) Body Functions & Structure Activity Participation Environmental Factors Personal Factors Source: ICIDH-2, 1999 September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 10

Moving from idea to estimation ICF as the calculated model Common perspective Common vocabulary Does not give estimation questions or an approach to quantify the ideas September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 11

Matching Purpose with Concept keeping in mind the end goal to address this reason, we have to begin by recognizing people who are at more serious danger than the all inclusive community of encountering limitations in taking an interest in part exercises without any convenience The wellspring of our theoretical beginning stage is drawn from one of the essential areas of the ICF September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 12

Selecting the Concept to Measure: The Body Function and Body Structure Identifies kind of debilitation Impairments don\'t as a matter of course reflect levels of limit or execution of the individual They find the anatomical part and the physiological working Person is not as a matter of course "at danger" We picked not to utilize this idea for our motivation September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 13

Selecting the Concept to Measure: Participation – contribution in an existence circumstance Represent issues an individual may have being included or incorporated into their group Involves the coordination of both physical and subjective working to fulfill numerous assignments inside and environment. Is too socially bound to fill our need. September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 14

Selecting the Concept to Measure: Activity – the execution of an activity or straightforward assignment Activity is the conscious execution of an activity (strolling) or errand (dressing) Activities are building squares of interest Activity impediments are a decent and essential identifier of "danger" of restrictions in cooperation in socially characterized parts. September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 15

Locating Risk in the ICF Model Health Condition ACTIVITY Body Functions & Structure Participation Environmental Factors Personal Factors Source: ICIDH-2, 1999 September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 16

Levels of Measurement Necessary to Capture Activity and Participation Mobility, seeing, hearing, learning Level 1 Willful Action Bathing, dressing, making suppers, clothing Specific Tasks Level 2 Visiting with companions, going out to supper Individual Organized Activity Level 3 Working at an occupation, being a guardian, citizenship parts Cultural Role Participation Level 4 Level of Complexity Type of Measure Examples September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 17

Measurement of evening out of chances Locate the meaning of incapacity at the most fundamental level of action/investment This level is connected with the capacity or failure to do essential capacities at the level of the entire individual (i.e. strolling, climbing stairs, lifting bundles, seeing a companion over the room) September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 18

Possible sorts of inquiries Questions that measure different spaces of working, for example, versatility, comprehension, tangible capacities, and so on. A qualifier would need to find out that the activity was proficient without human or mechanical help September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 19

Mobility Walking Climbing stairs Bending or stooping Reaching or lifting Using hands Sensory Seeing Hearing Communicating Understanding Speaking Cognitive capacities Learning Remembering Making choices Concentrating Emotional working Interpersonal cooperations Psychological prosperity Possible Question Choices September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 20

Criteria for Inclusion of Domains Cross social likeness Suitability for self-report Parsimony Validity crosswise over different methodological modes September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 21

Number of Domains Selected Workgroup in assention that Walking, Seeing and Cognitive working are center areas to be incorporated Earlier exchanges have shown that 3-4 inquiries are the most extreme accessible in numerous censuses Limitations on number of areas an element of space and mode – would we like to organize a space list so inquiries are accessible as space and different confinements are casual? September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 22

Draft questions for Censuses (general incapacity measure) Do you experience issues seeing regardless of the possibility that wearing glasses? Do you experience issues hearing regardless of the possibility that utilizing a portable hearing assistant? Do you experience issues strolling or climbing stairs? Do you experience issues recalling or focusing? Do you experience issues with (self-care, for example, washing all over or dressing? In view of a physical, mental, or passionate wellbeing condition, do you experience issues conveying (for instance understanding others or others understanding you)? a) No - no difficulty c) Yes - a considerable measure of trouble b) Yes - some difficulty d) Cannot do at all September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 23

Decision Elements Introductory proviso Response alternatives Use of a period qualifier Use or non-utilization of assistive gadgets September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 24

What We are Not Identifying Are we screening or making gauges? Screening spreads the net broadly – endeavors to lessen false negatives by tolerating false positives. Assessments are more centered around particular zones and ought to be more dependable. We are trying to speak to a continuum of involvement in an either/or setting. We can\'t speak to the aggregate continuum. September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 25

Meeting Products and Information Executive outline of gatherings, presentations, and papers posted on the Washington Group site: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/citygroup.htm Publication of key papers in a unique issue of Research in Social Science and Disability due this Fall September 19-20, 2005 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Slide 26

Willful activity - mirrors the individual\'s will to complete fundamental volitional real operations at the level of the living being (entire individual); purposeful utilization of essential faculties and body activities

Slide 27

Specific errands - The execution of a gathering of headstrong activities by a person. It is a marker of a progression of related or more entangled activities important to achieve a goal

Slide 28

Organized action - the achievement of an assortment of particular assignments and unshakable activities so as to finish a movement that is socially perceived or characterized in a society; requires some type of cooperation with others

Slide 29

Role interest - an individual\'s inclusion in performing perceived social parts

Recommended
View more...