IUCN Red Rundown Evaluations: Illustrations.


44 views
Uploaded on:
Category: Education / Career
Description
IUCN Red Rundown Evaluations: Samples Contextual investigation 1 Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback Gasterosteus sp. Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Range
Transcripts
Slide 1

IUCN Red List Assessments: Examples

Slide 2

Case Study 1 Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback Gasterosteus sp.

Slide 3

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Range The Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback is limited to Paxton Lake, which is situated on Texada Island, between Vancouver Island and territory British Columbia. Paxton Lake is little (17 ha) and has a most extreme profundity of around 15 m . Paxton Lake speaks the truth 90 m above ocean level and the main outlet, now dammed, drops around 80 m in a progression of little falls before entering Malisipina Strait, in this way secluding the lake and the upper segment of the stream from the ocean. There is no changeless surface stream into the lake. Map by Jim Stamos, Biological Sciences Dept., University of Buffalo. In light of McPhail 1993 Taxonomy The Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback is one of a couple of stickleback animal varieties in Paxton Lake that as of now are being depicted. Both species can be alluded to by the gallery number of the sort examples. There are five known Texada Island Stickleback species sets. Every pair comprises of a benthic animal varieties and a limnetic animal categories that contrast in appearance, eating routine and living space.

Slide 4

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Populace Its populace most likely surpasses 100,000 people. Albeit no information exist on patterns in populace size, it is trusted that the populace is pretty much stable as of now. Natural surroundings & Ecology The fish lives close to the lake\'s base. Grown-ups commonly nourish along the shallow lake edges originating before on amphipods, midge hatchlings and dragonfly sprites, snails, and so forth. Some little people encourage somewhat on microscopic fish. In the mid year, the fish involve the littoral zone in open, mud-bottomed circumstances over the deoxygenated zone, however littler people (<50 mm) are generally found in shallower water. The fish incline toward some spread and are regularly found around indented logs. They scatter over the whole lake base in the winter. Bringing forth happens in the shallower waters of the littoral zone and homes are generally found under spread in amphibian vegetation. Grown-ups achieve 90 mm long. With respect to different species in the class Gasterosteus , this species is forceful, has a wide mouth, few gill rakers, and a decreased number of parallel plates and dorsal spines.

Slide 5

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Dangers Previous aggravation because of mining close Paxton Lake influenced the populace quantities of the Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, however this has not been a risk subsequent to the mine shut. The potential presentation of colorful fish species into the lake is presumably the real risk now confronting the stickleback. The types of most concern are Brown Bullhead Catfish Ameiurus nebulosus and Pumpkinseed Sunfish Lepomis gibbosus , both of which are spreading on Vancouver Island through unapproved open transplants. No less than one animal varieties pair is as of now known not become terminated in the mid 1990s because of the presentation of catfish into Lake Hadley on Lasqueti Island. Preservation Measures The Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback is secured under the government Species at Risk Act (SARA). A Stickleback animal varieties recuperation group has been framed and a recuperation activity gathering was shaped for the Texada Island species sets (Paxton Lake and Vananda Creek Sticklebacks) and improvement and usage of a Recovery Strategy and Recovery Implementation (activity) Plan is in progress.

Slide 6

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Is the taxon qualified for Red List appraisal? Species not yet completely portrayed. In any case, a portrayal is in progress. Gallery voucher references are accessible. Dispersion of the species is known. YES

Slide 7

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Could model A be connected? (Populace decrease at a particular rate more than 10 years or 3 eras (whichever is longer) before, present, and/or future) Past aggravation from mining exercises influenced the populace, yet time allotment and size of the impacts are not given. Current populace seems, by all accounts, to be steady. NO

Slide 8

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Could paradigm B be connected? (Limited geographic extent AND serious discontinuity, proceeding with decrease and/or great variances) EOO and AOO edges for CR are met: confined pool of territory 17 ha (=0.17 kmâ²) (CR B1+2). Principle danger is potential for presented species, which would influence the entire lake and entire populace. Along these lines, stand out area (CR B1a+2a). In any case, there is no proof for proceeding with decrease in reach, natural surroundings, populace size or areas (CR B1b+2b don\'t make a difference). No data on changes; current populace seems, by all accounts, to be steady (CR B1c+2c don\'t make a difference). Almost - NT

Slide 9

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Can paradigm C be connected? (Little populace size and proceeding with decrease) The aggregate populace is evaluated at more than 100,000 people. The quantity of experienced people along these lines likely surpasses the 10,000 limit for Vulnerable. Additionally, there is no proof for proceeding with decay or compelling variances. NO

Slide 10

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Can foundation D be connected? (Small or limited populace) The evaluated populace size far surpasses the <1,000 edge for Vulnerable. Be that as it may, the species is known from one and only area (Paxton Lake) with an exceptionally limited reach (AOO <1 kmⲠand 1 area) and presented species are a genuine potential danger (VU D2). YES – VU D2

Slide 11

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. Could paradigm E be connected? (Quantitative examination assessing likelihood of termination in the wild) No quantitative investigation has been completed. NO

Slide 12

Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback, Gasterosteus sp. NO NT NO VU D2 NO Criterion A: Criterion B: Criterion C: Criterion D: Criterion E: Final appraisal: The Benthic Paxton Lake Stickleback ( Gasterosteus sp.) is Vulnerable (VU D2)

Slide 13

Case Study 2 Taylor’s Salamander Ambystoma taylori

Slide 14

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Range : Taylor’s lizard is endemic to Lake Alchichica, a saline hole lake situated in eastern Puebla, Mexico, at 2,290 m above ocean level. The Ambystoma lizards happening in the other common lakes around Alchichica are not firmly identified with this species. The surface territory of the lake is 2.3 kmâ². Scientific categorization Based on both allozymes and mtDNA, this is an exceptionally particular lizard. The Ambystoma lizards happening in other regular lakes around Alchichica are not firmly identified with this species.

Slide 15

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Population Even at its just known territory this is an uncommon animal groups, albeit some time ago it was basic there. Jumpers somewhere down in the lake have seen the species as of late. Living space & Ecology This lizard more often than not does not transform, and most people live for all time in water. However, periodic people have been known not. It breeds in the lake, and is typically found in profound water, regularly more than 30 m beneath the surface.

Slide 16

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Threats The most genuine danger to the species is water extraction and preoccupation bringing about the lake turning out to be considerably more saline. The water level has dropped numerous meters in the course of the most recent two decades. Proceeded with change and contamination of the lake is liable to result in the vanishing of this species. Endeavors to present fish in the lake have fizzled in light of its saltiness. Preservation Biology Taylor’s lizard does not happen in any ensured region. Hostage rearing may be a vital fleeting measure to spare this species, in the event that it is not very late. The insurance of the Alchichica lake is a critical need. This species is ensured under the class Pr (Special assurance) by the Government of Mexico.

Slide 17

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Is the taxon qualified for Red List evaluation? Depiction of the species has been distributed ( Brandon, Maruska & Rumph, 1981 ) . YES

Slide 18

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can basis A be connected? (Populace diminishment at a particular rate more than 10 years or 3 eras (whichever is longer) previously, exhibit, and/or future) The species was once in the past normal and is presently uncommon . In any case, no sign of the time period over which an assumed decay has occurred or information to have the capacity to assess the size of populace decrease . NO

Slide 19

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can standard B be connected? (Confined geographic reach AND serious discontinuity, proceeding with decrease and/or amazing vacillations) The aggregate lake range = 2.3 kmâ² thusly the Critically Endangered limits for degree of event (<100 kmâ²) and zone of inhabitance (<10 kmâ²) are both met (CR B1+2). Fundamental dangers are water extraction and contamination, which influence the entire lake and the entire populace: one and only area (CR B1a+2a). Natural surroundings quality declining (water extraction bringing on expanded saltiness), declining populace (now uncommon, continuous living space corruption) (CR B1b(iii,v)+2b(iii,v)). YES – CR B1ab(iii,v)+2ab(iii,v)

Slide 20

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can rule C be connected? (Little populace size and proceeding with decay) Although the populace is depicted as uncommon, it is hard to gauge real quantities of full grown people from this . NO

Slide 21

Taylor’s Salamander, Ambystoma taylori Can rule D be connected? (Small or confined populace) Population size can\'t be assessed from the data given . Species is limited to one and only, little area (AOO <10 kmâ², 1 area) (VU D2). Proceeded with change and contamination of the lake is prone to result

Recommended
View more...