Michelle Green Clark Maternal and Tyke Wellbeing (MCH) LeadershipTeam April 10, 2006.


58 views
Uploaded on:
Category: Food / Beverages
Description
Uniqueness between all inclusive community and custom curriculum populace ... 13% of 139,387 understudies get specialized curriculum. Working Budget is $1.7B - $11,535 per ...
Transcripts
Slide 1

A New IDEA: An Education Policy Addressing Disparities - A Case Study of Local Educational Agencies Choices Regarding Early Intervening Services Michelle Green Clark Maternal and Child Health (MCH) LeadershipTeam April 10, 2006

Slide 2

Objectives Clear comprehension of disproportionality in a custom curriculum Understand new financing stream for Early Intervening Services (EIS) in the Individual Disability Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Present conceivable choice for EIS that will highlight new mediations in early youth instruction Understand significant partners\' enthusiasm for EIS subsidizing Highlight arrangement of one nearby school board

Slide 3

How is training approach MCH strategy? Relationship amongst training and wellbeing Correlation of proficiency and wellbeing Educational fulfillment and wellbeing variations

Slide 4

Problem Disparity between overall public and specialized curriculum populace Inappropriate distinguishing proof in a specialized curriculum Restricted situations versus general training

Slide 5

Disproportionality Significant disproportional over-representation taking into account race or ethnicity: Identification of youngsters with incapacities Placement in a specific training setting Disciplinary activity, including suspension/ejection

Slide 6

Role of Government Federal level State level Local training power (LEA) level Parent part

Slide 7

Individual Disability Education Improvement Act of 2004 1975 – Education for All Handicapped Children Act 1997 – Individual Disabilities Education Act 2001 – President\'s Commission on Special Education 2005 – on July 1, Individual Disability Education Improvement Act of 2004

Slide 8

IDEA Early Intervening Services (EIS) 613(f)(1) Effective July 1, 2005 Final rules summer 2006 States offer own transitory rule Disproportionality exists - 15% of Part B Federal Dollars Students K-12 (accentuation K-3)

Slide 9

Case Study: Montgomery County, MD

Slide 10

Montgomery County Largest populace and riches in Maryland 13% of 139,387 understudies get custom curriculum Operating Budget is $1.7B - $11,535 per understudy High performing understudies Both racially and ethnically differing

Slide 11

Montgomery County Public School System MCPSa, 2005

Slide 12

Source of every single instructive asset in MCPS Source of all specialized curriculum reserves in MCPS MCPSb, 2005

Slide 13

Special Education and Total MCPS Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Group, Gender, and Special Services, 2005 MCPSa, 2005

Slide 14

Montgomery County Disproportional in each of the 3 classes

Slide 15

Special Education Enrollment by Racial Group – African American, 2005 MSDE STANDARD FOR MCPS MCPSa, 2005

Slide 16

Suspension Rate by Racial/Ethnic Group MCPSa, 2005

Slide 17

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) An Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Group MCPSa, 2005

Slide 18

Definition of EIS Professional advancement for educators and other school staff to empower such work force to convey experimentally based scholarly guideline and behavioral intercessions , including deductively based proficiency guideline , and, where suitable, guideline on the utilization of versatile and instructional programming Providing instructive and behavioral assessments , administrations, and backings , including logically based proficiency directions IDEA, 2004, 613(f)(1)

Slide 19

Identifying EIS Options Interviewed neighborhood instructive approach pioneers at elected, state, and nearby level Interviewed 3 separate analysts with awards coordinated by OSEP Specifically took a gander at energy in Maryland and where EIS administrations may go locally

Slide 20

Options for EIS Identified Response to Intervention (RtI) Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Special Education programming (4GL)

Slide 21

Response to Intervention (RtI) High quality guideline coordinated to understudies needs. Use information in regards to understudy learning after some time to settle on critical instructive choices, including qualification for a specialized curriculum administrations for understudies with particular learning inabilities (SLD).

Slide 22

Problem Solving Process Define the Problem (Screening and Diagnostic Assessments) What is the issue and why is it happening? Assess (Progress Monitoring Assessment) Develop a Plan (Goal Setting and Planning) What are we going to do ? Did our arrangement work? Actualize Plan (Treatment Integrity) Carry out the mediation Tilly, 2005

Slide 23

Response to Intervention: A Three-layered Model Research-based direction as a rule training classroom Klingner & Orosco, 2006

Slide 24

Research-based guideline at the primary level is for all understudies and comprises of unequivocal direction in: phonological mindfulness the alphabetic standard (letter-sound correspondence) familiarity with associated writings vocabulary improvement cognizance Tier 1 first Tier Klingner & Orosco, 2006

Slide 25

Tier 2 second Tier The second level is just for those understudies who don\'t achieve expected benchmarks utilizing an educational programs based advancement observing evaluation instrument, for example, the DIBELS (Dynamic Indicator of Basic Early Literacy Skills) Students get extra serious backing in little gatherings or separately This backing is given inside general instruction Students may get this extra backing in their classrooms or in an alternate setting Klingner & Orosco, 2006

Slide 26

Tier 3 third Tier Students who keep on struggling are then given a third level or level of help that is more escalated. It is this third level numerous would consider to be custom curriculum. Klingner & Orosco, 2006

Slide 27

Evidence – Option #1 Reading capability builds Special training referrals down particularly in learning handicaps Helps with mislabeling Test results enhance

Slide 28

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) History – 1997 IDEA School wide behavioral emotionally supportive network Involves whole school staff Goal – positive school atmosphere and environment

Slide 29

5% 15% 80% of Students CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Walker et al., 1996

Slide 30

OUTCOMES DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Four Elements of PBIS Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior Sugai & Horner, 2002

Slide 31

Classroom Lunchroom Bus Hallway Assembly Respect Others Use inside voice Eat your own particular nourishment Stay in your seat Stay to right Arrive on time to speaker Respect Environment & Property Recycle paper Return plate Keep feet on floor Put garbage in jars Take litter with you Respect Yourself Do your best Wash your hands Be at stop on time Use your words Listen to speaker Respect Learning Have materials prepared Eat adjusted eating regimen Go straightforwardly from transport to class Go specifically to class Discuss point in class w/others Teaching Matrix Sugai, 2006

Slide 32

Tool of Measurement – Office Referrals PBIS, 2006

Slide 33

Evidence: Option #2 (PBIS) Office referrals diminish Administration and showing time increments – staff fulfillment Suspension rates down Keeps kids with behavioral issues ( passionate bothered ) in a general instruction environment and learning School wide test scores increment

Slide 34

Education Referral and Tracking Software Management Information System Web based individualized learning arranges Improves documentation of administrations and intercessions Can connection to Medicaid charging

Slide 35

Management Software

Slide 36

Evidence: Policy Option #3 (4GL) Reduction in printed material Decrease expenses of a custom curriculum Increases custom curriculum test scores

Slide 37

Relevance to MCH Social Work Every tyke is in the educational system IDEA stores school social laborers Shift to more deterrent SW Social Workers driving PBIS groups

Slide 38

What might you put resources into?

Slide 39

4GL Software 2007 Budget MCPS

Slide 40

Questions and Answers?

Slide 41

References P.L. 108-446, Individual Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) (2004). Positive Behavior Supports and Interventions (PBIS). (2006). PBIS Maryland. Recovered April 7, 2006 from http://www.pbismaryland.org/President\'s Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2001). Another time: Revitalizing specialized curriculum for kids and their families . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Branch of Education. Klinger, J. & Orosco, M. (2006). Social contemplations with reaction to intercession (RTI) models and education guideline. Recovered April 1, 2006 from http://www.nccrest.org/disproportionality/JK.MO.MB.ppt#256,1,Cultural Considerations with Response to Intervention (RTI) Models and Literacy Instruction Montgomery County School System (MCPSa). (2005). Yearly write about our suggestion to take action . Rockville, MD: Montgomery County School System. Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPSb). (2006). Working spending plan . Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools.

Slide 42

References Sugai, G. (2006). Positive behavioral mediations and backings: Getting started. Recovered April 7, 2006 from http://www.pbismaryland.org/Presentations/SpringForum2006/SpringForum2006Plenary.ppt Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Prologue to the uncommon arrangement on positive conduct support in schools. Diary of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10 (3), 130-135. Tilly, W. D. (2005). Diagnosing the learning empowered: Response to intercession arrangements of IDEA \'04 Retrieved March 26, 2006 from http://www.nasdse.org/archives/NASDSE_RTI_Case_pt1.pdf Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, J. R., Sprague, D., Bricker, D., K

Recommended
View more...