Perusing your Accountability Reports U-PASS AYP AMAO Judy Park, Assessment & Accountability Director Russell Klein, Results Coordinator Utah State Office of Education August 2006Slide 2
Reading your Accountability Reports U-PASS, AMAO, AYP August 18 – Sevier D.O., 180 E 600 N, Richfield August 22 – Granite D.O., 2500 S. State St., Salt Lake August 23 – Weber D.O., 5320 S. Adams Ave. Pkwy, Ogden August 25 – Nebo Learning Center, 570 S. Principle St., SpringvilleSlide 3
Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability PlanSlide 4
U-PASS State Accountability Required by State Law School level report Based on different evaluations Includes participation & graduation rate 2006 – schools without a 12 th grade just 2007 – all schoolsSlide 5
U-PASS Accountability Plan Student Participation on Assessments Status Scores Percentage of understudies capable on the gathering of appraisals and different pointers Progress Scores Longitudinal measure in view of looking at the accomplishment levels of the same understudy starting with one year then onto the nextSlide 6
Achieved State Level of PerformanceSlide 7
U-PASS Accountability Plan Student Participation 95% Acceptable Status Score 80% Progress Score Low 0 – 189 Medium 190 - 214 High 215 - 400Slide 8
Progress Value TableSlide 9
Schools will be recognized as: Achieved State Level of Performance Participation is 95% and Total School AND Subgroup Status is worthy (80%) or advancement is medium (190) or high Needs help Participation is under 95% or Total School or Subgroup Status is not satisfactory and advancement is lowSlide 10
Language Arts (35%) ELA CRT (35%) Or ELA CRT (30%) & DWA 5% Math (35%) Math CRT Science (20%) Science CRT Attendance (10%) Schools without a 12 th grade Status and Progress ScoreSlide 11
U-PASS Accountability Plan Aggregate Subgroup Accountability Every understudy who has a place with a subgroup other than white Individual understudy proficiencies are included and isolated by the quantity of understudies to decide the subgroup capability level Any individual subgroup not meeting capability will show up on the front page of the reportSlide 12
U-PASS Accountability Plan Subgroup Status Accountability. Permits more noteworthy responsibility. Understudies in a subgroup with under 10 are currently incorporated into the total computation. Understudies are all the more genuinely spoken to. Every understudy just tallies once, paying little heed to the quantity of subgroups in which the understudy qualifies. Expanded unwavering quality. We are assessing a bigger gathering. More understudies and more schools are spoken to. Expanded legitimacy. We don\'t overweight little populaces. This lifts the weight of one subgroup being the sole determinant of unsatisfactory status of the school.Slide 13
The 2006 U-PASS Report Web-based report design An expanded measure of data accessible on every school Allows for "drill-down" dataSlide 15
Must accomplish both criteria Final ResultSlide 19
Subgroups Needing AssistanceSlide 20
Status "Drill Down"Slide 21
Click on Grade Name for Instant GraphSlide 22
Click on Grade Score for Further Drill Down Second Level "Drill Down"Slide 23
Third Level "Drill Down" Boxes develop "mouseover"Slide 24
Progress "Drill Down" coming in OctoberSlide 25
Additional ReportsSlide 26
U-PASS Additional Information: NRT ACT/SAT AP Concurrent Enrollment School Summary Information Student Summary Information Percent of understudy perusing on evaluation level (reported for evaluations 1-10) Dropout Rate (disaggregated by \'08) Disciplinary Action Course Taking Patterns and TrendsSlide 30
AYP ReportsSlide 31
Schools with a 12 th Grade Assessment Drill Downs Additional InformationSlide 32
AYP School Reports For 2006Slide 34
AYP Federal Accountability Required by Federal NCLB Title I Law School, District & State level Reports Based on Language Arts CRT & Math CRT Includes participation & graduation rateSlide 35
AYP 2006 Level 1 Three sections: Participation in testing Academic accomplishment School participation/graduation All-or-nothing ideaSlide 36
1 3 2Slide 37
AYP 2006 Level 1 Did the school make AYP? Math versus Dialect Arts? AMO (Annual Measurable Objectives) same as a year ago Consequences just for Title I schoolsSlide 38
4 1 3 2Slide 40
AYP 2006 Level 1 WHICH STUDENTS ARE IN THE AYP SCHOOL REPORTS?Slide 41
Students in AYP & U-PASS School Reports Two vast information accumulations 1) End-of-Year Clearinghouse 2) Core CRT Files These Two Files Need To Match To Be On AYP & U-PASS School Reports! 6 Fields for Matching: District#, School#, Last Name, First Name, Date of Birth, Gender As of Spring \'06 – SSID!Slide 42
Full Academic YearSlide 43
Math Core CRTsSlide 44
Language Arts Core CRTsSlide 45
AYP 2006 Level 1 Questions?Slide 46
AYP 2006 Level 2 Status versus Safe Harbor (Improvement) Safe Harbor 10% diminishment in % of understudies not capableSlide 47
AYP 2006 Safe Harbor (Improvement) Not Proficient StatusSlide 48
AYP 2006 Safe Harbor (Improvement) Not Proficient StatusSlide 49
AYP 2006 Safe Harbor (Improvement) ImprovementSlide 50
AYP 2006 Safe Harbor (Improvement) ImprovementSlide 51
AYP 2006 Safe Harbor (Improvement) Good for Improvement Shows Improvement Good for Status Improvement Does not demonstrate change Not Proficient StatusSlide 52
AYP 2006 Safe Harbor (Improvement) Made AYP Made AYP Shows Improvement Made AYP Does not indicate change Not Proficient StatusSlide 53
Safe HarborSlide 55
AYP 2006 Level 2 Safe Harbor Additional Indicator is just utilized when Safe Harbor count is requiredSlide 56
AYP 2005 Level 2 Confidence Interval on Status 99% Confidence Interval on Safe Harbor 75% Participation & Additional Indicator N/ASlide 57
Confidence Interval Voting – exit surveysSlide 58
Confidence Interval on StatusSlide 59
Confidence Interval on Safe HarborSlide 60
AYP 2006 Level 2 N size – 10 versus 40 Small N = Automatic YESSlide 61
AYP 2006 Level 2 N=40 investment, participation, and graduation N=10 scholarly accomplishmentSlide 65
AYP 2006 Graduation rate – 85.7% One year postponed (have until Sep 1) 05 information from distribution center 04, 03 information from USOE factual documents Quality of information has enhanced 40 approaches to make (or not make) AYPSlide 67
Times 10 40 approaches to make (or not make) AYPSlide 68
Available on the protected FTP siteSlide 72
AYP 2006 Level 2 Questions?Slide 73
AYP 2006 Level 3 Definition of "safe harbor" Definition of "support" Definition "certainty interims" Definition of "graduation rate" UAASlide 74
AYP 2006 Level 3 Questions?Slide 75
AYP 2006 Did your school "make it"? Interest – DID YOU MEET IT? Investment – Is the N estimate under 40? Did they have 95% interest? Did they normal 95% support in the course of the last three (or two) years?Slide 76
AYP 2006 Did your school "make it"? Status – Is the subgroup estimate under 10? Status – Is the % sufficiently capable? Status – If the % capable is insufficient – does the certainty interim change it?Slide 77
AYP 2006 Did your school "make it"? Safe Harbor – Is there a 10% lessening in understudies not capable? Safe Harbor – Is the % diminishment of understudies not capable inside the certainty interim?Slide 78
AYP 2006 Did your school "make it"? Participation/Graduation Rate – Is the subgroup under 40? Participation/Graduation Rate – Did the school meet 93% participation rate or 85.7 graduation rate Attendance/Graduation Rate – has there been an expansion from the earlier year?Slide 79
Level Three ClarificationsSlide 80
AYP 2006 Level 3 Participation Category – Students selected on test date. Support inside tests – Students you\'ve had for the full scholastic year. (subset of "classification" set) Participation – graduate/go to. Is ALL understudies…Slide 81
95% ParticipationSlide 82
LEP Subgroup DefinitionSlide 83
Additional Indicator AYP Attendance 93%Slide 84
Additional Indicator AYP Graduation Rate 85.7%Slide 85
UAA Testing Special Ed Alternate Assessment Grade level is determined in light of birthdate. Center Test Id and grade level will be utilized to figure out which Actual Test ID to relegate an understudy to. LA and grade level will compare to an Actual Language (Reading) class for that understudy. Mama and grade level will compare to a math course. UAA understudies whose birthdate is in 9-twelfth grades will be added to GE0812R Geometry. They are a piece of High School Math AYP! UAA in 7-eighth grade will be added to seventh grade math.Slide 86
Out-of-Level Testing Not permitted No for interest No for scholastic accomplishment Math Levels: 6 th – Math 6; 7 th – Math 7; 8 th – Pre-Alg. Anything lower for the evaluations is Out-of-Level and considered Not Proficient.Slide 87
District AYP Reports Previous District AYP Report Grades 3 – 8 justSlide 88
District AYP Reports 2006 District AYP Report Grades 3 – 8 Grades 10 – 12 Business Rule An LEA will get a report taking into account both 3-eighth and 10-twelfth grade AMO\'s. A LEA must fizzle at both the 3-8 AND the 10-12 grade levels to come up short AYP. (Either subject)Slide 89
District AYP Reports 2006 District AYP Report Grades
Assessing the Viability of Mediations: Responsibility Annemoon van Erp Senior Researcher, Wellbe ...
Utilizing Information from the CCSSE to Empower Change Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Leslie Croot, M.S. ...
Understudy records in the document will show up in sequential request by school. ... Guarantee u ...
Vis-à-vis meeting. Conference. Going to presentation. Room exchange. Visiting the ... getting t ...
0 PID cases among 4,300 IUD clients in China. 8 PID cases among 846 IUD clients in Africa (6 ... ...
Claims in Diamond with this File Name number of cases acknowledged into Diamond for that ... The ...
Nightfall. Willow. Wash. Wilson. BJHS. EJHS. D108. Math ISAT 2005 (All Students) ... Dusk. Willo ...
2. Government K-12 Accountability System NCLB-AYP. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Adequate Yea ...
. . . . . Profound smokestack. . . . . 1. . 2. . 3. . Ferny section line. Sling second jolt. Bla ...
Note About This Presentation. In spite of the fact that we utilize advancement observing measure ...
2. Responsibility Systems. FederalNo Child Left Behind Act of 2001Defines NCLB orders for Title ...
Responsibility alludes to having shared objectives and obligation regarding the viability of our ...
. ADMINISTRATOR\'S POLICY STATEMENT ON...THE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD . Arrangement STATEMENT. Indiv ...
Federal Accountability AYP Update . ACET Conference March 31, 2010. Shannon Housson and Est ...
AYP FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS: NCLB ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY PROVISIONS ECS State Leader ...
REMEMBER!!!!!!. Every single third grade understudies must pass the READING area of the CRCT.If ...
2/10/2012. JBL Associates. 2. Exclusive School Accountability. 2/10/2012. JBL Associates. 3. H.R ...
Test 18. Responses of Aldehydes and Ketones. Presentation. Aldehydes and ketones are carbonyl co ...