Prologue to the Control of Listeria monocytogenes ( Lm ) in Prepared to-Eat Items; Between time Last Administer.


85 views
Uploaded on:
Category: Medical / Health
Description
Prologue to the Control of Listeria monocytogenes ( Lm ) in Prepared to-Eat Items; Interval Last Lead Little and Little Foundation Execution Workshop Control of Lm in RTE items Foundation FMIA, PPIA, EPIA
Transcripts
Slide 1

Prologue to the Control of Listeria monocytogenes ( Lm ) in Ready-to-Eat Products; Interim Final Rule Small and Very Small Establishment Implementation Workshop

Slide 2

Control of Lm in RTE items Background FMIA, PPIA, EPIA wholesome, not debased, and legitimately stamped, marked, and bundled. FMIA and PPIA: Adulteration bears or contains any harmful or pernicious substance that may render it damaging to wellbeing been arranged, stuffed, or held under insanitary conditions

Slide 3

Control of Lm in RTE items Background: During the 1980’s, Lm started to rise as an issue in prepared meat and poultry products.â  In the 1990’s, episodes of foodborne sickness brought on by Lm. From 1999-2003 different Agency distributions were issued tending to Lm

Slide 4

Control of Lm in RTE items Background: Federal Register Interim Final Rule 6/6/2003 Control of Listeria monocytogenes in RTE Meat and Poultry Products; Final Rule 9 CFR Part 430

Slide 5

Control of Lm in RTE items Implementation of new RTE regulations Why do I have to roll out improvements? How can this influence establishment’s delivering RTE items? What are the progressions or new prerequisites? At the point when will I be obliged to roll out the improvement? Will I have to alter my SSOP and/or HACCP arrangement?

Slide 6

§430.4 Control of Lm in Post-lethality Exposed RTE Products Lm can defile RTE items that are presented to nature after a lethality treatment (devastate/execute). Lm is a danger that a foundation must control through its HACCP arrange, or avoid in the earth through a SSOP or other essential project on the off chance that it produces RTE item that is uncovered post-lethality. RTE item is corrupted in the event that it contains Lm or in the event that it contacts surfaces defiled with Lm .

Slide 7

Control of Lm in Post-lethality Exposed RTE Products keeping in mind the end goal to keep up clean conditions important to meet this necessity, a foundation creating post-lethality uncovered RTE item must agree to one of three options.

Slide 8

Alternative 1 Listeria monocytogenes (L.m.) Control Post-Lethality Treatment Of Product AND Anti-Microbial Agent/Process That Suppresses/Limits Growth

Slide 9

Alternative 2 Listeria monocytogenes (L.m.) Control Post-Lethality Treatment Of Product OR Anti-Microbial Agent/Process That Suppresses/Limits Growth AND Sanitation Program

Slide 10

Alternative 3 Listeria monocytogenes (L.m.) Control Sanitation Program That MUST meet particular prerequisites for all items : MUST meet extra necessities for frank and shop sort items AND

Slide 11

Risk to Product Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Risk > Alternative 1 Risk >

Slide 12

For All Three Alternatives Establishments may utilize confirmation testing, which would be notwithstanding FSIS check testing, that incorporates tests for Lm or a marker life form, for example, Listeria species, to confirm the viability of their sanitation methods in the post-lethality handling environment.

Slide 13

For All Three Alternatives (cont.) Sanitation measures and techniques for antimicrobial operators or procedures that control Lm may be consolidated either in the establishment’s HACCP arrangement or in its SSOP or other essential projects. On the off chance that these control strategies are incorporated in the SSOP or essential system, and not as a CCP in the HACCP arrangement, the foundation must have documentation supporting the choice in its peril investigation that Lm is not a danger sensibly liable to happen.

Slide 14

For All Three Alternatives (cont.) Establishments must keep up sanitation in the post-lethality environment as per section 416. In the event that Lm control measures are incorporated in the HACCP arrangement, the foundation must approve and confirm the viability of these Lm control measures as per § 417.4.

Slide 15

For All Three Alternatives (cont.) If Lm control measures are incorporated in the SSOP, the adequacy of these measures must be assessed as per ⧠416.14. On the off chance that the Lm control measures are incorporated in an essential system other than the SSOP, the project and the outcomes delivered by the system must be incorporated in the documentation that foundation is obliged to keep up as per § 417.5.

Slide 16

For All Three Alternatives (cont.) The foundation must make the check comes about that exhibit the Lm\'s viability control measures it utilizes, whether under its HACCP arrangement or SSOP or other essential program(s), accessible to FSIS investigation work force upon solicitation.

Slide 17

Supplying Information to FSIS An foundation that delivered post-lethality uncovered RTE item might give FSIS, in any event every year, or all the more regularly as dictated by the Administrator, with evaluations of yearly creation volume and related data for the sorts of meat and poultry items handled under every option indicated in § 430.4(b).

Slide 18

Using so as to label Establishments that control Lm a post-lethality treatment or an antimicrobial operators or procedure that wipes out or lessens, or stifles or limits the development of Lm , may announce this on the item name gave that the foundation has accepted the case.

Slide 19

Workshop Breakout sessions .:t

Recommended
View more...