Review of Acquisition Policy Changes Presentation to the NDIA Industrial Committee November 18, 2008 .


115 views
Uploaded on:
Description
2003 - 2008. Six years of allotments and approval actsA change in congressional leadershipStudies and related recommendations:The Quadrennial Defense Review Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment (DAPA)The Defense Science Board (DSB) Summer Study on TransformationThe Beyond Goldwater-Nichols Study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Assessments by the Gover
Transcripts
Slide 1

Diagram of Acquisition Policy Changes Presentation to the NDIA Industrial Committee November 18, 2008 PRE-DECISIONAL: DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT: For discourse purposes as it were. Draft working paper. Try not to discharge under FOIA. This instructions incorporates draft approach dialect that has not been formally endorsed. NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Mr. Skip Hawthorne OUSD(AT&L) DPAP/PACC 1

Slide 2

2003 - 2008 Six years of appointments and approval acts A change in congressional administration Studies and related suggestions: The Quadrennial Defense Review Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment (DAPA) The Defense Science Board (DSB) Summer Study on Transformation The Beyond Goldwater-Nichols Study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Assessments by the Government Accountability Office Resulting pilot activities and experimentation A progression of useful strategy reminders Since the last DoDI 5000.2 was distributed we\'ve had:

Slide 3

Defense Acquisition Business Process Issues A C B Process passage at Milestone A, B, or C Entrance criteria met before entering stage Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability User Needs & Technology Opportunities (Program Initiation) FOC IOC Production & Deployment System Development & Demonstration Concept Refinement Technology Development Operations & Support Design Readiness Review FRP Decision Review Concept Decision LRIP/IOT&E Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment Most potential projects continue to Milestone B without an ancestor survey to evaluate the ability require and coordinate investigation of choices Technical development is not sufficiently exhibited before program start Program cost, calendar, and execution insufficiently educated by outline contemplations Requirements "crawl" proceeds to de-balance out projects No formal and powerful open door between Milestone B and Milestone C for MDA to survey advance, alter/concede prerequisites, or, steady with statute, re-structure the program

Slide 4

Mandatory "Materiel Development Decision" Production & Deployment O&S Materiel Development Decision goes before section into any period of the protection procurement administration framework Entrance criteria met before entering stage Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability Technology Opportunities & Resources User Needs Full Rate Prod DR MS B MS C MS A Materiel Solution Analysis Engineering & Manufacturing Development JCD ICD Strategic Guidance Joint Concepts CDD CPD FAA FNA FSA TechDev MDD AoA Incremental Development FCB COCOM OSD/JCS When the ICD shows the requirement for a materiel arrangement, the JROC might prescribe that the MDA consider potential materiel arrangements. . . .The MDA, working with suitable partners, might figure out if there is adequate data to continue with a Materiel Development Decision (MDD). In the event that the MDA chooses that extra examination is required, an assigned office might plan, and the MDA should affirm, consider direction to guarantee that fundamental data is accessible to bolster the choice. . . . The Materiel Solution Analysis Phase starts with the MDD. The MDD is the formal passage point into the obtaining procedure and should be compulsory for all projects. . . . At the MDD, the Joint Staff should exhibit the JROC proposals and the DoD Component might show the ICD including: the preparatory idea of operations, a portrayal of the required ability, the operational hazard, and the reason for discovering that non-materiel methodologies won\'t adequately moderate the capacity crevice. The D,PA&E (or DoD Component comparable) might propose consider direction for the AoA. . . . The MDA might endorse the AoA ponder direction; decide the obtaining period of passage; recognize the underlying survey point of reference; and assign the lead DoD Component(s). MDA choices might be recorded in an Acquisition Decision Memorandum. . . . Taking after endorsement of the review direction, the lead DoD Component(s) should set up an AoA consider plan to survey preparatory materiel arrangements, distinguish key advances, and gauge life-cycle costs. 4 DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT: For dialog purposes as it were. Draft working papers. Try not to discharge under FOIA.

Slide 5

Prototyping and Competition "Developmental procurement requires . . . Innovation improvement going before start of an addition should proceed until the required level of development is accomplished, and models of the framework or key framework components are delivered . . ." "The TDS and related financing should accommodate at least two contending groups delivering models of the framework or potentially key framework components before, or through, Milestone B. Model frameworks or proper part level prototyping might be utilized to diminish specialized hazard, approve plans and cost gauges, assess fabricating forms, and refine necessities. . . ." 5 DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT: For talk purposes as it were. Draft working papers. Try not to discharge under FOIA.

Slide 6

Preliminary Design Review (PDR) MS B MS C MS A FRP DR Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development Engineering & Manufacturing MDD P-PDR A PD O&S Development PDR SRR PDR or CPD CDD DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT: For discourse purposes as it were. Draft working papers. Try not to discharge under FOIA.

Slide 7

Focused Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase CDD MS A MS B MS C FRP DR Engineering & Manufacturing Development Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development P-PDR A MDD P-CDRA PD O&S SRR PDR or CPD The reason for the EMD stage is to build up a framework or an augmentation of capacity; finish full framework joining (innovation hazard decrease happens amid Technology Development); build up a moderate and executable assembling process; guarantee operational supportability with specific consideration regarding limiting the coordinations impression; actualize human frameworks incorporation; plan for producibility; guarantee reasonableness; secure CPI by executing proper methods, for example, hostile to alter; and exhibit framework reconciliation, interoperability, wellbeing, and utility. The Capability Development Document, Acquisition Strategy, Systems Engineering Plan, and Test and Evaluation Master Plan should manage this exertion. Framework Capability and Manufacturing Process Demonstration. This exertion is expected to show the capacity of the framework to work conveniently predictable with the affirmed key execution parameters and that framework generation can be bolstered by shown fabricating forms. The program should enter System Capability and Manufacturing Process endless supply of the Post-Critical Design Review Assessment and foundation of an underlying item gauge. This exertion should end when the framework meets endorsed necessities and is exhibited in its proposed surroundings utilizing the chose generation delegate article; fabricating forms have been adequately shown in a pilot line environment; mechanical abilities are sensibly accessible; and the framework meets or surpasses leave criteria and Milestone C entrance prerequisites. Coordinated System Design. This exertion is planned to characterize framework and arrangement of-frameworks usefulness and interfaces, finish equipment and programming nitty gritty outline, and diminish framework level hazard. Incorporated System Design might incorporate the foundation of the item benchmark for all setup things. 7 DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT: For exchange purposes as it were. Draft working papers. Try not to discharge under FOIA.

Slide 8

MDA Conducts Post-CDR Assessment CDD MS A MS B MS C FRP DR P-PDR A Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development MDD P-CDRA PD O&S EMD SRR PDR or CPD Post-Critical Design Review Assessment The MDA might lead a formal program appraisal taking after framework level CDR. The framework level CDR gives a chance to evaluate outline development as confirm by measures, for example, fruitful finish of subsystem CDRs; the rate of equipment and programming item work to details and drawings finished and under arrangement administration; arranged restorative activities to equipment/programming insufficiencies; sufficient formative testing; an appraisal of environment, wellbeing and word related wellbeing dangers; a finished disappointment modes and impacts investigation; the distinguishing proof of key framework qualities; the development of basic assembling forms; and a gauge of framework unwavering quality in view of exhibited dependability rates. 8 DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT: For talk purposes as it were. Draft working papers. Try not to discharge under FOIA.

Slide 9

Configuration Steering Boards Configuration Steering Boards (CSB) . The Acquisition Executive of every DoD Component might build up a CSB with wide official enrollment including senior delegates from the Office of the USD(AT&L) and the Joint Staff. The CSB should meet at any rate once yearly to survey all prerequisites changes and any huge specialized design changes for ACAT I and IA programs being developed that can possibly bring about cost and timetable effects to the program. Such changes will by and large be rejected, conceding them to future squares or augmentations. Changes might not be endorsed unless assets are recognized and plan impacts moderated. The PM, in conference with the PEO, should, on a generally yearly premise, distinguish and propose an arrangement of descoping alternatives, with supporting method of reasoning tending to operational ramifications, to the CSB that decrease program cost or direct prerequisites. The CSB might prescribe to the MDA (if an ACAT ID or IAM program) which of these choices ought to be executed. Official choices on de-checking choice execution should be composed with the Joint Staff and milita

Recommended
View more...