SACRAMENTO COUNTY LEA CASE STUDIES .


111 views
Uploaded on:
Category: Business / Finance
Description
SACRAMENTO Province LEA Contextual investigations. WARING'S DUMP OBIE'S DUMP. WARING'S DUMP. Shut, Illicit, Relinquished (CIA) Site East of Interstate 99 Thickly populated private group 5 bundles claimed by 3 property proprietors Morrison Spring keeps running close by the site. WARING'S DUMP. FRUITRIDGE Street.
Transcripts
Slide 1

SACRAMENTO COUNTY LEA CASE STUDIES WARING\'S DUMP OBIE\'S DUMP

Slide 2

WARING\'S DUMP Closed, Illegal, Abandoned (CIA) Site East of Highway 99 Densely populated private group 5 bundles claimed by 3 property proprietors Morrison Creek keeps running nearby the site

Slide 3

WARING\'S DUMP FRUITRIDGE ROAD HIGHWAY 99

Slide 4

HISTORY 1930s: Soils obtain pit made 1940s: Population development, Morrison Creek starts to flood 1950s: County permits fill 1960s: Waring\'s Dump requested to stop Mid 60s: Morrison Creek "waste channel" County\'s surge control extend.

Slide 5

DEVELOPMENT INQUIRY Sep 2002: LEA reached Jan 2003: LEA meeting with proprietors Dec 2003: New property proprietor demands LEA endorsement to construct living arrangement and church on landfill property. Advancement arranges trigger Title 27 Requirements

Slide 6

SITE INVESTIGATION Mar 2004: CIWMB CIA Program Site Characterization Jul 2004: LEA meets CIWMB, RWQCB, and DTSC, according to Burn Dump Protocols. Jan 2005: LEA issues authorization request to top and grade landfill.

Slide 7

OBIE\'S DUMP Closed, Abandoned, Illegal (CIA) Site 2 sections of land inside a 9 section of land package, one proprietor 30 ft profound soil get pit Property encompassed by late improvements Developers inspired by building up this property

Slide 8

OBIE\'S DUMP

Slide 9

OBIE\'S DUMP CALVINE ROAD HIGHWAY 99 SHELDON ROAD

Slide 10

HISTORY Created amid soil tunnel operations 1990: Current proprietors acquired property. 199:1 County permits fill 1992-97: LEA routine examinations 1996: County evaluating grant denied 1997: LEA Notice and Order 2001: County PW issues NOV

Slide 11

DEVELOPMENT INQUIRY Dec 2001: LEA reached Dec 2002: LEA meeting with proprietor and imminent purchaser/designer Feb 2003: Site Investigation Oct 2003: LEA meets with CIWMB, RWQCB, and DTSC, according to Burn Dump Protocols.. Dec 2003: LEA meeting with proprietor, imminent engineer, CIWMB, DTSC, RWQCB.

Slide 12

ENFORCEMENT? Dec 2003: DTSC VCA program. Damage 2004: LEA asks for conclusion arrange Jul 2004: LEA 2 nd ask for Aug 2004: Owner signs DTSC VCA contract Feb 2005: DTSC "authoritatively" takes lead.

Slide 13

CIA Site, Burn slag Hazardous levels of lead and zinc Surrounded by private utilize 3 Property proprietors Development proposed Development arrange pulled back Lower monetary region Little $$ Remediation not monetarily possible, left to LEA requirement 2136 Cleanup CIA Site, Burn fiery debris Hazardous levels of lead Surrounded by private utilize 1 Property proprietor Development proposed Development arrange proceed with Higher financial range $$$$ Available Motivated remediation, search out DTSC Approval, Pay for VCA. WARING\'S OBIE\'S

Slide 14

BURN DUMP PROTOCOLS Burn Dump Protocols oblige LEAs to counsel with CIWMB, RWQCB and DTSC. RWQCB-groundwater risk DTSC-touchy utilize proposed, change being used, high level of danger to bar wellbeing or environ. LEA-everything else Only RWQCB or DTSC can give affirmation to unhindered utilization of the site (clean conclusion)

Slide 15

CHALLENGES Coordination with different organizations Property proprietor dissatisfaction Who makes authorization move if proprietor doesn\'t continue with remediation? Locales with roused proprietors and $$ may search out DTSC endorsement Sites without $$ and low danger remain with the LEA and may take more time to remediate.

Slide 16

Tammy Derby (916) 875-8573 Sr. Ecological Specialist DerbyT@SacCounty.net Sacramento County Environmental Management Department 8475 Jackson Road Sacramento, CA 95826

Recommended
View more...