The Effects of Coyote Removal in Texas: A Case Study in Conservation Biology .


56 views
Uploaded on:
Category: People / Lifestyle
Description
Fields of West Texas. Shortgrass prairiechaparral. Essential Producers:. Grasses, herbaceous blossoming plants (forbs)Mesquite, yucca. Herbivores
Transcripts
Slide 1

The Effects of Coyote Removal in Texas: A Case Study in Conservation Biology Adapted from action by Margaret Carroll Department of Biology Framingham State College National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science site; http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/ventures/cases/case.html

Slide 2

Plains of West Texas Shortgrass prairie chaparral

Slide 3

Primary Producers: Grasses, herbaceous blossoming plants (forbs) Mesquite, yucca

Slide 4

Herbivores & Scavengers Jackrabbits & cottontails Ground squirrels Rats (3 species) Mice (7 species) Ord\'s Kangaroo Rat

Slide 5

Mesopredators Badgers Bobcats Skunks Gray fox

Slide 6

Top Predator Coyote

Slide 7

What does this sustenance web resemble? Thoughts – Draw on board

Slide 8

Part I Predator evacuation The Nature Conservancy needs to decide the impacts of coyote expulsion in West Texas Your gathering has been requested that present a proposition

Slide 9

Part I Questions What particular question do you plan to reply? What sort of exploratory treatment and control will you utilize? What factors do you expect to screen?

Slide 10

Part II Congratulations! Your proposition has been subsidized. Test outline: Four, 5,000 ha destinations 2 controls, 2 medicines Similar natural groups spoke to

Slide 11

Part II – Experimental Design Figure 1. Area of test destinations in West Texas. Destinations 1 and 2 were the control locales. Coyotes were expelled from locales 3 and 4 and from a 5-km outskirt (figure from Henke and Bryant 1999, utilized with consent).

Slide 12

Part II-Experimental Design Experimental plan: Four, 5,000 ha destinations 2 controls, 2 medications All coyotes expelled from treatment locales & 5 km fringe No control of control locales Animal people group checked on all destinations: 1 year preceding treatment 2 years taking after coyote evacuation

Slide 13

Part II Question Make two forecasts concerning the impacts of coyote expulsion on the fauna of West Texas.

Slide 14

Part III - Mesopredators Mesopredator populaces checked for a long time Total wealth of badgers, wildcats, skunk and fox found on treatment and control locales plotted every year Use these information to decipher the effect of coyote evacuation on the group of little mammalian predators

Slide 15

Part III - Mesopredators Figure 2. Relative plenitude of mammalian mesopredators in the test destinations previously, then after the fact treatment. Mistake Bars speak to one standard blunder (figure altered from Henke and Bryant 1999, utilized with authorization).

Slide 16

Part III - Mesopredators Questions What impact does coyote evacuation have on the mesopredator populaces? Foresee what may have happened to the rat populaces subsequently of changes in the mesopredator populaces.

Slide 17

Part IV – Rodent Population Size You choose to investigate information on rat populace estimate next As a measure of populace size, you look at rat biomass in grams per hectare in treatment versus control territories more than 3 years

Slide 18

Part IV – Rodent Population Size Figure 3. Biomass of rodents in the trial destinations prior and then afterward coyotes were expelled from the treatment locales. Mistake Bars speak to one standard blunder (figure altered from Henke and Bryant 1999, utilized with authorization).

Slide 19

Part IV – Rodent Population Size Questions What do you believe is the essential component controlling rat populace development? Given the adjustments in populace estimate, what different changes may you expect in the rat group?

Slide 20

Part V – Rodent Diversity Population size of individual rat species demonstrates Ord\'s kangaroo rodent doing exceptionally well in treatment ranges Examine the information:

Slide 21

Part V – Rodent Diversity Figure 4. Differences of rodents in the trial locales prior and then afterward coyotes were expelled from the treatment destinations. Rat assorted qualities was assessed utilizing Simpson\'s Index. Mistake Bars speak to one standard blunder (figure adjusted from Henke and Bryant 1999, utilized with authorization).

Slide 22

Part V – Rodent Diversity Questions In one sentence abridge the significance of the chart appeared in Figure 4 . How does the focused accomplishment of Ord\'s kangaroo rodent change without coyotes? What term could be utilized to depict the part of the coyote in this group? Propose one conceivable reason for the decrease in rat differing qualities in the control regions after treatment starts. In your answer to The Nature Conservancy, by what means will you condense the effect of coyote expulsion in this group?

Slide 23

References Henke, S.E., and F.C. Bryant. 1999. Impacts of coyote evacuation on the faunal group in Western Texas. Diary of Wildlife Management 63:1066-1081. Carroll, M. 2002. The impacts of coyote expulsion in Texas: A contextual investigation in preservation science. National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science site: http://ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/ventures/cases/case.html ; site went to 9/06

Recommended
View more...