The Possibility of Zero GHG Emanation Autos.


129 views
Uploaded on:
Description
The Possibility of Zero GHG Emanation Autos Prof. David R. Hodas Widener College School of Law Wilmington DE Diary of Ecological Law and Prosecution Symposium: LIVING ON A Limited EARTH: Vitality Law and Strategy for Another Time October 10, 2008 School of Law College of Oregon
Transcripts
Slide 1

The Prospect of Zero GHG Emission Cars Prof. David R. Hodas Widener University School of Law Wilmington DE Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation Symposium: LIVING ON A FINITE EARTH: Energy Law and Policy for a New Era October 10, 2008 School of Law University of Oregon

Slide 4

Vehicle weight versus.. speeding up As motors turn out to be more effective they have been utilized to expand quickening and weight not build fuel proficiency

Slide 6

Transportation utilizes 70% of U.S. oil utilization Last week (Oct 3) the U.S. imported (net of exports)12.9 million barrels of petroleum for every day (gross imports were14 million)(this deciphers into > 4.7 billion bbls for every year) @$100/bll U.S the expense of these imports speaks the truth $1.29 billion for each day or $470 billion for each year. U.S. devours around 43% of the world’s fuel (2003 information)

Slide 7

In 2006 transportation in the U.S. autos represent 1.99 billion metric huge amounts of CO 2 emanations Petroleum: 1.952 billion (gasoline’s offer is 1.19 billion mt) Electricity for transportation: 5.2 Natural gas: 32.5 U.S. power creation from fossil energizes represents 2.344 billion tons of CO 2 for every year. Together (3.534 billion mt), U.S. gas utilization and power era include around 60% of U.S. CO 2 emanations or just shy of 14% of worldwide CO 2 discharges

Slide 8

Can we decrease CO2 from both power and transportation? Just in the event that we can move to renewable wellsprings of power Renewable Electricity challenge: how to store it for utilization when required? Can Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) autos help meet the test?

Slide 9

Plug-in Vehicles V2G Slides gave by Prof. Willett Kempton, University of Delaware

Slide 10

Vehicle to Grid Arrows demonstrate heading of force stream

Slide 11

V2G Basic Math Average auto driven 60 minutes/day, subsequently, time stopped is 23 hours/day; Daily normal travel: 32 miles, stockpiling for 100 - 250 miles Practical force draw from auto: 10 - 20 kW US control: generation=978 GW; load=436 GW avg (EIA) US 241 million autos (FHWA 2005) x 15 kW = 3,615 GW, in this way... Force of armada is >3x era; >8x load !

Slide 12

Electric Markets Initial markets (high esteem, low effect on battery, no framework changes): Regulation (“Frequency regulation”) Spinning stores Intrahour conformity Larger however additionally difficult markets Peak force UPS for the dissemination framework

Slide 13

Daily Load versus Regulation (=correction of ACE) ACE, Area Control Error, ~0.5% of control territory load Grid administrators send successive signs to on-line generators (furnished with AGC) to either build or lessening yield. MW Aggregate Daily Load Curve Time of Day from Letendre et al 2006

Slide 14

Average Annual Market Clearing Prices: Regulation January 30, 2008

Slide 15

Average Annual Market Clearing Prices: Spinning Reserves

Slide 16

Basic per Vehicle Values 10 –Year Present Value V2G Revenue Potential Assumptions: 80% accessibility, Reg. $40/MW-h, Spin. $10/MW-h, 7% markdown rate, sample counts

Slide 17

Vehicle Monitoring Automated information gathering while matrix joined keeping in mind driving Power from framework to vehicle (- kW) and from vehicle to network (+kW) AGC regulation sign from PJM (+-kW) State of charge (%) Wind reinforcement: wind yield versus displayed vehicle armada charge/release

Slide 18

EV/PHEV Design Tradeoffs Batteries lavish; engine extravagant High line-current gives quick charge, roadside revive; includes just direct cost if done right Regulation pay straightforwardly relative to line power! Line force breaking points: Size of fitting, circuit, administration Energy/time = kWh/dispatch

Slide 19

what number autos for an A/S contract? PJM least A/S get: 1 MW CalISO least A/S get: 1 MW Assume 2/3 accessibility (1/3 inaccessible on the grounds that driving, battery at wrong SOC, and so on Calculation: 2/3 accessibility implies ... ___ kW/auto * ___ autos * 2/3 = ___ MW for 1 MW at 15 kW, need 100 autos for 1 MW at 1.5 kW, need 1000 autos

Slide 20

Vision One-half vehicle armada is electric commute (BEV + PHEV). National security & environment advantages. Heaps of capacity on the electric framework, close loads. Electric framework stockpiling is dispatchable by ISO/TSO and/or burden serving substance. Electric matrix is more steady and solid, A/S is bounteous and less extravagant Intermittent renewables can be a much higher part of the era blend.

Slide 21

Legal and Policy Questions How move venture procedure in a deregulated electric framework to renewable power connected to V2G Infrastructure: parking areas, transmission limit, dispersion systems Federal or state regulation? Connection to environmental change motivators, tops Smart meter laws, collection outline Contract and strategy for success plan, assessment, proprietorship, utility coordination Other potential issues?

Slide 22

Mid-Atlantic Grid-Interactive Car Consortium Partners University of Delaware PHI: Delmarva Power, Atlantic Electric, PEPCO, and so forth ACUA PJM AC Propulsion Comverge Observers Tesla Motors Google.org State of Delaware (DEDO, PSC, Energy Office) anon http://www.magicconsortium.org .:tslidesep.

Recommended
View more...