The reasonable state of the Defense Industry later on .


22 views
Uploaded on:
Category: Business / Finance
Description
The likely shape of the Defence Industry in the future. Simon Allan Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP. Structure of Presentation. Assumptions Some existing trends Some sources of change Synthesis. Policy Assumptions. DIS maintained Defence Procurement Directive implemented
Transcripts
Slide 1

The feasible state of the Defense Industry later on Simon Allan Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP

Slide 2

Structure of Presentation Assumptions Some current patterns Some wellsprings of progress Synthesis

Slide 3

Policy Assumptions DIS kept up Defense Procurement Directive actualized UK Market stays "open" Constant spending Shipbuilding and complex weapons in an exceptional position

Slide 4

Policy Assumptions UK Defense Spending as % of GDP Calculation = Defense Expenditure Limits as a rate of total national output at market costs. Sources: Defense Spending Reviews 2004 and 2007 and UK National Statistics UK Output, Income and Expenditure 2 nd Qtr 2007

Slide 5

Martin Marietta OAO Corp Sipping Holdings Sytax Gray Lockheed ACS Lockheed Martin Stasy Ltd (UK) Aspen Systems Loral Oricon Boeing Co Jeppeson Sanderson Rockwell Aerospace C-Map Boeing Co. Hughes Electronics McDonnell Douglas Aviall British Aerospace Siemens Plessey Electronic Systems United Defense Industries GKN Vickers Alvis SEMA BAE Systems LM Electronics Systems Marconi ATPI STI Armor Holdings Westinhouse Electric Teledyne Ryan Litton Industries TWR Inc. Illgen Simulation Northrop Corp Northrop Grumman Corp Logicon Newport News Shipbuiding Xon Tech Integic Corp Hughes Aircraft Honey well Business Unit Raytheon E-Systems Oakley Networks Raytheon Corp Photon Research CTAS Texas Instruments Solypsis Corp Beechcraft Industry union 1995 2000 2005

Slide 6

Industry Consolidation Capacity impacts Competition impacts Market fascination impacts

Slide 7

Mod Procurement Strategies Outsourcing/PPPs/Privatization Condo/Sponsored Reserves Use of "integrator" models – FRES, MFTS and so forth

Slide 8

Platform Longevity Upgrades Inserts TLCM

Slide 9

"unmanned" Technologies Section 220 National Defense Authority Act 2006 " It might be an objective of the Armed Forces that: (1) by 2010, 33% of the flying machine in the fleet are unmanned; and (2) by 2015, 33% of the operational ground battle vehicles are unmanned"

Slide 10

Changes to the "definition" of "barrier" Social hunger for supported ground troop organizations? Limits amongst "protection" and "country security" Cyber fighting – monetary "fighting" – sovereign assets Climate change/security of supply issues

Slide 11

Synthesis Growing bolster benefit organizations High level frameworks integrators upheld by coordinated innovation organizations Consolidation with larger amounts of "remote" possession New item "sections" eg UAVs, UCAVs and so forth Migration to "new" markets with higher edges and better social profile

Recommended
View more...