The Uplifting news about The Terrible News Gospel.

Uploaded on:
The Uplifting news about The Terrible News Gospel The Awful News Gospel: People are "fallen", "debased" and unequipped for making the best choice "Human instinct" is characteristically malevolent. I am not dependable God is to be faulted, not I The Uplifting news: It's more entangled than that:
Slide 1

The Good News about The Bad News Gospel

Slide 2

The BAD News Gospel: Humans are “fallen”, “depraved” and unequipped for making the best decision “Human Nature” is characteristically insidious. I am not dependable God is to be faulted, not I

Slide 3

The Good News: It’s more confused than that: You are responsible—which implies you can change things. The uplifting news is that – in spite of fleeting impetuses to cheat – it is our human instinct that permits us to reason and to settle on better decisions for the long haul.

Slide 4

If all you are getting is the Bad News: consider what “human nature” truly is. “Live with the grain” and act as per the configuration.

Slide 5

What is “Human Nature”? People can grasp—and act upon—abstract ideas. People can imagine what\'s to come. People can comprehend that different people are their equivalents. People can construct a world that works better for every one of us.

Slide 6

All People are Created Equal If you have the privilege to do something to another person, They have the same right to do likewise to you. Any “rights” that can’t be universalized are not “rights” Your “rights” to swing your arm end at alternate person’s nose.

Slide 7


Slide 8

What is “winning?”

Slide 9

The Pragmatic Partnership Ethic: Whether or not you think about this as a “ethical issue” The crucial inquiry may be: Is this an one-time chance to snatch and run—Or is this a long haul relationship? Future advantages exceed transient increases from tricking. Cases of the agreeable position in amusements : The quality premium in advertising “TQM” “Supply Chain Management” There is never a “last round” Even if this is your last contact with this accomplice, Your methodology will win you a long haul notoriety that will persist to business with others. The “Radar O’Reilly” Phenomenon. Your life partner and your youngsters

Slide 10

None of this is new This Pragmatic Partnership Ethic can be portrayed as illuminated self-interest. Balanced Selfishness is a temperance The Pragmatic Partnership Ethic has a typical name.

Slide 11

But… Does that mean you ought to dependably “turn the other cheek” and let corrupt individuals keep running over you?

Slide 12

There is an issue with this… 1.There are jolts all (around 5%). 2.Jerks change the amusement from win-win to dilemma. 3. On the off chance that you don’t ensure yourself, you will get hurt and bastards will be enabled to hurt others. 4. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you regard everybody as rascals, it will wreck the amusement and everybody will lose.

Slide 13

The Evolution of Cooperation (Robert Axelrod, 1985) Simulation competition of systems for the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (IPD). The least difficult procedure, Tit-for-tat (TFT) was most reliably the victor. Blow for blow: begin with collaboration, then resound the opponent’s proceed onward the last round. Properties: Nice, never the first to desert; Provocable, promptly, on one surrender; Forgiving, can come back to collaboration after abandonment. Straightforward and Transparent, the rival recognizes what will happen.

Slide 14

Tit-for-tat TFT wins however not by doing so as to vanquish rivals, but rather better with other TFT players. By definition, TFT can, best case scenario, have a tie score in an arrangement with a solitary rival. No adversary is ever “defeated.” But TFT collects higher aggregate scores by discovering and collaborating with helpful players, while abstaining from being exploited by the defectors. TFT requests just value, promoting so as to do admirably common intrigue instead of misusing shortcoming.

Slide 15

What is “winning?” Winning isn’t helping so as to “beat your opponent.” Winning is accomplished your rival to win as well.

Slide 16

Evolutionary amusements and development of a “just” progress Successful methods flourish and become Less effective methodologies lessen A predictable absconding (“meanies”) society must be steady if “nice” players are confined from one another. A “nice” society is steady and can oppose intrusion by “meanies” just if the TFT guideline is taken after: “avoid misuse: Be provocable by the first abandonment of the other player.” TFT likewise helps other people by making it harder for exploitative systems to survive. Axelrod’s Conclusion: “Reciprocity is a superior establishment for profound quality than is unrestricted cooperation.”

Slide 17

Justice ensures the frail and keeps up human advancement It is not good to endure the domineering jerk. “If you don\'t visit awful neighborhoods, then terrible neighborhoods will visit you.”

Slide 18

The Tit-for-Tat Rule in Games (Simulation studies demonstrate Tit-for-tat method gives the best expected results when managing the 5% who are bastards) 1. Regard everybody as though they have a place with the other 95% (endure periodic powerlessness as a cost for seeking after the best long-run normal result). 2. On the off chance that somebody demonstrations like a rascal, pound them. 3. On the off chance that they keep on being

View more...