Treating Depression in Primary Care Strengths Weaknesses of the NICE rule .


36 views
Uploaded on:
Description
Proof based Medicine. How great is the proof that, for the normal individual, therapeutic treatment is superior to a fake treatment?. . Confirmation based Medicine. How great is the confirmation that, for the normal individual, restorative treatment is superior to a placebo?If there are a few medicines: What is the most financially savvy treatment for a specific condition, for a normal individual?.
Transcripts
Slide 1

Treating Depression in Primary Care Strengths & Weaknesses of the NICE rule David Goldberg Institute of Psychiatry King\'s College, London

Slide 2

Evidence-based Medicine How great is the proof that, for the normal individual, therapeutic treatment is superior to a fake treatment?

Slide 3

Evidence-based Medicine How great is the proof that, for the normal individual, restorative treatment is superior to a fake treatment? In the event that there are a few medications: What is the most financially savvy treatment for a specific condition, for a normal individual?

Slide 4

Evidence-based Medicine How great is the confirmation that, for the normal individual, therapeutic treatment is superior to a fake treatment? On the off chance that there are a few medications: What is the most savvy treatment for a specific condition, for a normal individual? EBM is based upon meta-examinations of distributed RCTs

Slide 5

Patient-based Evidence What is the best treatment for me, with my specific attributes and peculiarities ?

Slide 6

Patient-based Evidence What is the best treatment for me, with my specific qualities and quirks ? To react to this, the clinician has to know the proof from RCTs, however to be set up to apply it to this specific individual

Slide 7

Problems with RCTs of discouragement In the USA, specialists regularly publicize for "patients" in daily papers, and pay for their co-operation

Slide 8

Problems with RCTs of sorrow In the USA, agents frequently promote for "patients" in daily papers, and pay for their co-operation It is most impossible that a clinician will ask an extremely discouraged patient to have a half shot of a fake treatment

Slide 9

Problems with RCTs of dejection In the USA, examiners regularly publicize for "patients" in daily papers, and pay for their co-operation It is most improbable that a clinician will ask a seriously discouraged patient to have a half possibility of a fake treatment despite the fact that we may create single seriousness scores utilizing say, the Hamilton – how homogeneous are the patients?

Slide 10

Problems with RCTs of sorrow In the USA, agents frequently publicize for "patients" in daily papers, and pay for their co-operation It is most improbable that a clinician will ask a seriously discouraged patient to have a half shot of a fake treatment in spite of the fact that we may create single seriousness scores utilizing say, the Hamilton – how homogeneous are the patients? On the off chance that many negative reviews have been stifled, what is doing meta-investigations on decidedly chosen reviews?

Slide 11

Emperor\'s New Drugs Kirsch et al 2002 Relying on RCTs enrolled with the FDA: Differences amongst AD and PBO just 2 symptoms on Ham-D Such little contrasts can deliver vast "% reacted " contrasts Argues that such little contrasts are due to symptoms of ADs

Slide 12

Severity at benchmark and reaction (- half) following 4 weeks\' treatment: Angst fake treatment, moclobemide, imipramine

Slide 13

Irving Kirsch\'s figure:

Slide 14

How homogeneous? Consider 2 youthful unmarried female patients; both matured 18; both with a Ham-D score of 24 How sensible is it to attempt to say everything in regards to seriousness with a solitary score on a gloom scale?

Slide 15

Consider 2 youthful unmarried female patients; both matured 18; both with a Ham-D score of 24 Patient 1: is a solitary mother Parents separated Mother was discouraged Sexual manhandle since aet 11 Left home aet 14 Casual sex since Depressed for a long time Recently more terrible since tyke taken into care

Slide 16

Consider 2 youthful unmarried female patients; both matured 18; both with a Ham-D score of 24 Patient 1: is a solitary mother Parents separated Mother was discouraged Sexual mishandle since aet 11 Left home aet 14 Casual sex since Depressed for a long time Recently more awful since kid taken into care Patient 2: college understudy Supportive guardians No FH of wretchedness Many companions Affair with sweetheart most recent 2 years He as of late left with another young lady Depressed for 2 weeks since he exited

Slide 17

Will these two young ladies react similarly to treatment? Ought to the treatment be the same?

Slide 18

NICE: The National Institute for Clinical Excellence An administration supplier of data in view of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) for the advantage of clinicians and their patients. Rules on schizophrenia, dietary problems, nervousness issue, self-mischief and now - despondency

Slide 19

NICE: Terms of Reference Clean meta-examinations to be performed Exclusions: <16; puerperal; physical ailment Outcome: adequacy x3, averageness, poisonous quality Economic contemplations to be incorporated Outputs: long archive on net, content & tables; short shape; a short frame, User\'s shape

Slide 20

User Involvement 3 Users on fundamental gathering 1 on each of 3 subgroups: administrations, sedate medicines, mental medications Gave their endorsement at each stage Told us now huge an adjustment in indications was "advantageous" Thus: " Statistically however not clinically noteworthy "

Slide 21

The NICE scale A = Systematic surveys, RCT \'s B = 1+ Well directed review C = Opinions of \'regarded specialists\': yet fit for experimental examination GPP = Our sentiments of good practice

Slide 22

"Ventured Care" Who needs treatment? Who ought to give it? At the point when ought to patients be alluded?

Slide 23

"Ventured Care" The strict EBM approach : Which patients justify dynamic treatment? Which medicines for misery ought to be accessible in essential care, which in pro care? Who ought to give them? - accept a seriousness score gives equivalent data about wretchedness Who ought to give it? At the point when ought to patients be alluded?

Slide 24

"Ventured Care" Patient-based confirmation : Which people justify dynamic medicines? Which specific medicines will suit this person? At the point when ought to this individual be alluded? Prove from EBM ought to be obeyed in maybe just 70% of cases

Slide 25

Who is in charge of care? What do they do? Intense Wards Risk to Life Medication,ECT nursing care CMHT, OPD, emergency group, Day Hospital Treatment resistance visit repeats Medication, complex Psychological i.v\'s PCMHW, GP, Counselor, social laborer, clinician Moderate or Severe Depression Medication,Brief psych. mediations, bolster bunches GP, Practice nurture, Practice advisor Mild Depression Active Review: Self Help, Computerized CBT, Exercise Recognition Why do they isn\'t that right?

Slide 26

Step 1: Recognition in Primary care & general doctor\'s facility mind Screening with 2 routine inquiries in high hazard bunches [B] OR previous history of sorrow huge physical ailment causing inability other emotional well-being problems e.g. dementia

Slide 27

Use two screening questions.. Amid the previous month, have you been feeling down, discouraged or miserable? Amid the most recent month, have you frequently been pestered by having little intrigue or delight in getting things done

Slide 28

Consider mental, social & physical of the patient, and the nature of interpersonal qualities, & survey affect on: Depression Choice of treatment [consider choices, regard understanding preference] Monitoring

Slide 29

RISK dependably get some information about self-destructive thoughts & plan, exhort patients & carers to be vigilant GPP patients under 30 endorsed SSRIs must be cautioned of self-destructive thoughts, and seen again seven days later C guarantee that self-destructive patients have satisfactory social support GPP

Slide 30

Information give proper data on nature, course and treatment of depression GPP dodge utilization of clinical dialect & give data in dialect comprehended by the patient GPP reach the individuals who don\'t go to take after up C

Slide 31

Recognized, MILD DEPRESSION Patients may enhance suddenly where mediation is not needed, organize assist meeting inside 2 weeks contact patients who don\'t go to consider exhortation about rest cleanliness and physical practice [3+ sessions/week; >45mins for 12 weeks] consider guided self improvement or composed bolster materials electronic medications may likewise help

Slide 32

Step 2: Recognized mellow sadness The accompanying are altogether suggested: physical practice [B] critical thinking [B] guided self improvement [A] Computerized CBT [A] "attentive holding up" [GPP] St. John\'s Wort (with reservations!) [B] AD\'s not suggested for introductory Rx of gentle or sub-limit despondency [C]

Slide 33

So, is the paradigm for "Real Depression" too low? Most likely NOT: Clinicians ought to assess time course, family & past history, accessibility of social support and also "seriousness" on a side effect scale they ought to offer option medications and in addition, and once in a while rather than, medications Some ADs have different impacts than disposition rise, including anxiolytic & sleep inducing impacts, which can be to a great degree valuable Anything that energizes a "clinical administration" approach is attractive the clinician must show up in the Coroner\'s Court!

Slide 34

Self-help versus holding up rundown Mead et al Psych Med 2005, 35, 1633 114 patients with on edge melancholy randomized to self improvement (home-made) and holding up rundown. No indicative measure, yet Beck DI = 26 at onset 3 month FU – no distinctions in result in either gloom or uneasiness; BDI = 17-20

Slide 35

Step 3: Moderate & serious melancholy Active treatment suggested in all cases Offer antidepressants in all cases, however talk about apprehensions about habit Monitor patients for symptoms & self-destructive thoughts routinely proceed with AD\'s for 6/12+ after abatement

Slide 36

Psychological medicines Problem settling by PC staff [B] If mental treatment favored, CBT is Rx of decision [16-20 sessions more than 6-9 months + consider boosters] [A]

Slide 37

Antidepressants looked at all in all practice, they all hav

Recommended
View more...