Anatomy of the scleral ossicles in brazilian birds - PDF Document

Presentation Transcript

  1. Original article Anatomy of the scleral ossicles in brazilian birds Lima, FC.*, Vieira, LG., Santos, ALQ., De Simone, SBS., Hirano, LQL., Silva, JMM. and Romão, MF. Wild Animal Research Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia – UFU, Av. Dr. Luiz Antonio Waack 1365, Umuarama, CEP 38402-030, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil *E-mail: fabianocl21@hotmail.com Abstract The sclera is the outermost layer of the eye. In some vertebrates, it consists of a scleral ring of osseous plates that afford protection against pressure and help maintain the shape of the eyeball. The morphology, number, development and position of the scleral ossicles differ in distinct groups of vertebrates. Therefore, the objective here was to examine the number, shape and arrangement of the scleral ossicles in Brazilian birds of different orders. The study involved 208 birds of 18 orders, which died from causes unrelated to eye infections. The birds’ eyeballs were removed and subjected to diaphanization and staining of the ossicles with Alizarin red S. All the eyeballs analyzed presented scleral ossicles in a fixed position in the central portion of the eyeball, but which varied in size, shape and number. The number of bony plates in the various bird species varied from 11 to 16, with a modal number of 14, and their shape was predominantly quadrangular, showing a similar pattern in species of the same order. Some specimens presented differences in the number of ossicles in the right and left eyeball, as in Spheniscus magellanicus, Elanus leucurus, Ramphastos toco and others and Leptodon cayanensis also presented a scleral sesamoid bone. The distribution and morphology of the ossicles vary according to the taxonomic group, although species of the same order present a similar pattern. Keywords: alizarin, eyeball, morphology, skeleton. 1 Introduction the second is to aid the function of the ciliary muscles, especially in the anterior portion of the cornea, suggesting a role of visual accommodation (KING and MCLELLAND, 1984; COULOMBRE, AJ. and COULOMBRE, JL., 1973; FRANZ-ODENDAAL and VICKARYOUS, 2006). It has also been suggested that these structures may help binocular vision, enabling the animal to adjust the shape of the cornea to modify its focusing power (LINDLEY, HATHCOCK, MILLER et al., 1988; COULOMBRE, AJ. and COULOMBRE, JL., 1973; CURTIS and MILLER, 1938), although any inference about its function should consider its generalized occurrence in several taxa (FRANZ- ODENDAAL, 2008). The morphology, number and distribution of the scleral ossicles vary greatly among different groups of animals (VIEIRA, SANTOS and LIMA 2007). In most birds, the ossicles are rectangular in shape, while in others they are slightly elongated and concave (HALL, 1981; PINTO and HALL, 1991). However, their detailed pattern is still unknown in several animals, and this knowledge would be highly relevant in several clinical and therapeutic areas. Therefore, the objective of this work was to investigate the number, shape and arrangement of the scleral ossicles in birds of different orders. The sclera is the outer covering of the eye, a tough structure that preserves the shape of the eyeball, preventing internal and external pressure from modifying its shape (HILDEBRAND and GOSLOW, 2006; MACHECHA and OLIVEIRA, 1998; FRANZ-ODENDAAL, 2008). Its skeleton is composed of scleral cartilage and ossicles, bony plates arranged jointly with the cartilage in a fixed position surrounding the sclera without articulating with any other skeletal elements. Some vertebrates such as fish, reptiles and birds possess both elements, while others, such as crocodilians and ophidians, have only scleral cartilage (FRANZ-ODENDAAL and HALL, 2006; WARHEIT, GOOD and QUEIROZ, 1989). According to Hall (1981) and Pinto and Hall (1991), the scleral papillae induce the formation of the scleral ossicles, and there is always an exact correspondence between the number of ossicles and papillae (COULOMBRE, AJ. and COULOMBRE, JL., 1973). Hall and Miyake (1992) explain that the scleral papillae ossify intramembranously in reptiles and birds and endochondrally in fish. Experimental studies of Gallus gallus embryos demonstrated that the scleral bone skeleton emerges from the condensations of mesenchymal cells originating from the neural crest (HALL, 1981; JOHNSON, 1973; FRANZ-ODENDAAL, 2005; MIYAKE and HALL, 1992). The individual role of each ossicle is still a subject of controversy, but two collective functions are well described. The first is to protect and support the eyeball during deformation while flying or diving (ROMER, 1956), and 2 Material and methods This study involved 208 birds of 18 orders supplied by the clinic of the Veterinary Hospital at the Federal University of Uberlândia, from January 2007 to May 2009. The birds Braz. J. Morphol. Sci., 2009, vol. 26, no. 3-4, p. 165-169 165

  2. Lima, FC., Vieira, LG., Santos, ALQ. et al. had died of several causes, though none of them from eye infections. The eyeballs of each animal were removed and subjected to diaphanization and bone staining, following the method described by Davis and Gore (1936). The steps consisted of fixation in 10% formaldehyde, dehydration with ethyl alcohol, diaphanization with potassium hydroxide (KOH 2%), bone staining with Alizarin red S, and conservation of the material in glycerin. the same order. The modal number of ossicles was 14, with variations phylogenetically distributed among the different genera. In some taxa, the number of plates was uniform in the different specimens evaluated, as in Ara nobilis, Coragyps atratus, Columba sp. and Tyto alba. These may also represent the pattern for their order, given that in Strigiformes, for example, the mode was 15 ossicles in each eye, as well as in T. alba. According to Romer (1956), the number of plates that make up the ring varies from 2 to 32 among the different species. An average of 10 to 17 ossicles has been reported in the modern groups, and all the birds in this study lay within this interval. Based on comparisons among ratites, tinamids and other fossil birds (QUEIROZ and GOOD, 1988), the primitive number of ossicles is 14 to 15, but today the number varies according to the group evaluated. Pelicaniforms present 14 to 15 (CURTIS and MILLER, 1938), while Sula reportedly possess the smallest number of ossicles, 10 (LEMMRICH, 1931; CURTIS and MILLER, 1938), and the modal number in Phalacrocoracidae is 13. According to Underwood (1970), Lacertas invariably have 14 ossicles with a fixed superposition pattern in the scleral cartilage, unlike Amphisbaenia, in which they are variable and irregular. These variations may be associated with the niche these animals occupy, which can be inferred for the different birds, since these traits are variable among the different genera, but maintain a pattern if one compares similar ethologies. Both domestic and wild Galliformes possess a modal number of 14 ossicles. Queiroz and Good (1988) reported the presence of 14 ossicles in Penelope jacquacu and P. purpurascens, P. albipennis and Perdix perdix, the same number observed in Penelope ochrogaster. In Piaya cayana, Crotophaga ani and Cariama cristata, the authors describe the presence of 12 ossicles. The number is similar in these related Cuculiformes, although in C. cristata the number of plates varied from 12 to 14. The aforementioned authors found 15 ossicles in Struthio, Dromaius, Crypturellus cinnamomeus and Tinamotis pentlandii, while Lammrich (1931) found 12 in Catarrhactes chrysocome, Sula bassanus, S. capensis, S. serrator, S. abbotti, and Todus todus, as well as in 11 other species of Psittacidae, which seems to be the standard number for this group, albeit with a slight variation in Ara ararauna, Aratinga solstitialis and Amazona sp. There may be differences in the number of ossicles present in the right and left eye in some species, or even in individuals. Only one Spheniscus magellanicus analyzed here presented 13 ossicles in the right sclera and 14 in the left, and Elanus leucurus had 15 in the right eye and 16 in the left, while in Ramphastos toco the number varied from 12 to 14 in both antimeres. In the only specimen of Leptodon cayanensis, the left eye had a small peripheral one, which Franz-Odendaal and Vickaryous (2006) described in Bubo bubo as a scleral sesamoid bone. The ossicles exhibit a predominantly quadrangular shape (Figure 2), as reported by Franz-Odendaal and Hall (2006), albeit without uniformity. In Falconiformes, they are square or rectangular, in Psittaciformes, Columbiformes and Gruiformes they are trapezoidal, and in birds of the order Piciformes they are irregular and have sinuous edges. In reptiles, the ossicles are normally flat, although they may sometimes be slightly curved. Their arrangement surrounding the sclera creates superpositioning of the ossicles 3 Results and discussion All the eyes presented scleral ossicles in a fixed position in the central portion of the eyeball (Figure 1). The ossicles varied in size, shape and number, and did not present a consistent pattern of distribution and dimensions in the different species (Figure 2). According to Modesto and Anderson (2004), birds and reptiles are organized in the same group and their scleral ossicles are morphologically similar, well developed (FRANZ-ODENDAAL and HALL, 2006), and contribute to preserve the shape of the eyeball (ROMER, 1956). In birds, the arrangement of the ossicles in the scleral cartilage forms a groove in the concavity of the eye, which plays an important role in accommodating the cornea, as well as in its protection (FRANZ-ODENDAAL and HALL, 2006). These structures are delicate and have persisted throughout the evolution of several vertebrates (ROMER, 1956). They have been reported in Gephyrostegus, Seymouria, Labidosaurus, Bolosaurus, Prolacerta, Sphenodon and others, varying greatly in number and morphology (PAREDES, 1942), as well as in the birds evaluated. The ossicles of fishes and birds can be considered homologous, although they are not situated exactly in the same region and ossify differently in these two groups (EAMES, DE LA FUENT and HELMS, 2003; EAMES and HELMS, 2004). The presence of ossicles forming incomplete rings has been reported in Saurischian birds, and complete rings with 13 to 15 plates in Ornithischia (OSTROM, 1961; GALTON, 1974). Heilmann (1926) found 14 ossicles in Archaeopteryx, although Wellnhofer (1974) reported that this bird had ‘approximately 12’ ossicles (QUEIROZ and GOOD, 1988). Among the groups of reptiles and teleost fish, the presence of the scleral skeleton is considered a synapomorphic trait that indicates homology among the gnathostomata (MAISEY, 1986; DONOGHUE, FOREY and ALDRIDGE, 2000; FRANZ-ODENDAAL and HALL, 2006), and its arrangement is considered a plesiomorphic trait. The number of plates in the distinct birds varied from 11 to 16 (Table 1, Figure 2), and was similar in species of Figure 1. Photographs of the scleral ossicles of birds subjected to the protocol of diaphanization and bone staining with Alizarin red S. a) Ossicles of Gallus gallus domesticus; and b) Individual ossicles of Caracara plancus. Bar: 5 mm. 166 Braz. J. Morphol. Sci., 2009, vol. 26, no. 3-4, p. 165-169

  3. Scleral ossicles in birds Figure 2. Photographs of the scleral ossicles of several birds. a) Piaya cayana RE (right eye); b) Nothura minor RE; c) Theristicus caudatus RE; d) Elanus leucurus LE (left eye); e) Penelope ochrogaster RE; f) Piculus sp. LE; g) Melanerpes candidus LE; h) Ramphastos toco RE (*superposition); i) Aramides calopterus LE; j) Megarhynchus pitangua RE; k) Ara ararauna LE; l) Chloroceryle americana LE; m) Crax fasciolata RE; n) Vanellus chilensis RE; o) Columbina talpacoti LE; p) Turdus rufiventris RE; q) Cariama cristata RE; r) Leptodon cayanensis LE (sesamoid bone (arrow); view of temporal face); s) Aratinga leucophthalmus RE; and t) Nyctibiusgriseus LE. View of anterior pole. Bar: 5 mm. in most species. In some cases these plates touch each other at the edges, forming a kind of suture, but in most cases they imbricate in a differentiated pattern. This superposition offers an advantage to animals, since it allows for the expansion and contraction of this structure to accommodate the eyeball (ROMER, 1956). The superposition pattern provides evidence of the homology of the ossicles, based on the evaluation of events in which the same number of ossicles derived from the loss in different episodes (QUEIROZ and GOOD, 1988). In Falconiformes, the ossicles were imbricated in a straight line throughout their extent, while in Psittaciformes, Braz. J. Morphol. Sci., 2009, vol. 26, no. 3-4, p. 165-169 167

  4. Lima, FC., Vieira, LG., Santos, ALQ. et al. Table 1. Continued... Table 1. Number of ossicles in birds of different species. Táxon Nº of specimes Nº of ossicles RE Táxon Nº of specimes Nº of ossicles RE LE LE STRUTHIONIFORMES Rhea americana TINAMIFORMES Nothura minor Nothura maculosa ANSERIFORMES Amazonetta brasiliensis Anas sp. GALLIFORMES Colinus cristatus Penelope ochrogaster Crax fasciolata SPHENISCIFORMES Spheniscus magellanicus CICONIIFORMES Egretta thula Tigrisoma sp. Theristicus caudatus CATHARTIFORMES Coragyps atratus FALCONIFORMES Elanus leucurus Buteo magnirostris Buteo albicaudatus Micrastur semitorquatus Micrastur ruficollis Caracara plancus Gampsonyx swainsoni Herpetotheres cachinna ns Falco sparverius Leptodon cayanensis CUCULIFORMES Crotophaga ani Piaya cayana GRUIFORMES Rallus maculatus Porphyrula martinica Cariama cristata Aramides calopterus CHARADRIIFORMES Vanellus chilensis COLUMBIFORMES Columba sp. Columbina talpacoti PSITTACIFORMES Ara nobilis Amazona sp. Aratinga solstitialis Pyrrhura sp. Ara ararauna Aratinga leucophthalmus Legend: RE - right eye; and LE - left eye. STRIGIFORMES Athene cunicularia Tyto alba Rhinoptynx clamator Asio stygius CAPRIMULGIFORMES Nyctibusgriseus CORACIIFORMES Chloroceryle americana Ceryle torquata PICIFORMES Ramphastos toco Ramphastos dicolorus Colaptes campestris Piculus sp. Colaptes punctigula Melanerpes candidus PASSERIFORMES Gnorimopsar chopi Megarhynchus pitangua Turdus rufiventris Cyanocorax caeruleus Legend: RE - right eye; and LE - left eye. 12 15-16 15-16 17 15-16 15 15 14-16 15-16 15 15 14-16 4 2 2 1 1 15 15 15 15 1 15 14 15 14 4 15 15 10 1 1 13 14 13 13 1 1 1 13 14 14 13 14 14 27 13-14 13 14-13 14 13 13 12-13 13 14 14 13 14 1 2 1 1 1 1 13 14 1 1 4 14 14 14 14 15 14-16 2 1 1 1 13-14 14 14 12 14 14 14 12 8 15 15 1 5 1 1 1 15 15 15 14 16 16 15 15 14 16 13 14-15 15 14 14 14 14-15 15 14 14 14+1 1 1 1 1 2 1 12 12 12 12 Figure 3. Photographs of the scleral ossicles of Athene cunicularia LE; a) view of anterior pole; and b) view of temporal face. Superposition (arrow). Bar: 5 mm. 1 2 8 5 15 14 13 14 12-13 14 12-14 14-15 Columbiformes, Charadriiformes and Gruiformes, due to their morphology, the ossicles were in contact with each other mainly at the external edge of the sclera, giving the overlapping region a triangular aspect. In fast-flying birds such as Falconiformes and Strigiformes (Figure 3) and aquatic birds such as S. magellanicus, the elliptical shape of the eyeball influences the morphology of the ossicles, which are elongated and, especially in Strigiformes, concave, giving the eyeballs of these birds a tubular shape. This apparatus provides passive help for the eyeball’s resistance against deformation by water or during flight (ROMER, 1956), conferring visual acuity, support and protection (FRANZ-ODENDAAL and HALL, 2006). This extra support represents an advantage when the eyes are subjected to strong water pressures or during flight. According to Curtis and Miller (1932), the scleral ossicles Coraciiformes, Passeriformes, 4 15 15 7 5 11 11 11 11 9 12 12 12 11-12 12-13 12 12-13 12 11-12 12-13 12 13 12 7 1 2 7 168 Braz. J. Morphol. Sci., 2009, vol. 26, no. 3-4, p. 165-169

  5. Scleral ossicles in birds and cartilage also aid in the adjustment of the pupil and the ciliary muscles involved in visual accommodation ( FRANZ-ODENDAAL and HALL, 2006). JOHNSON, LG. Development of chick embryo conjuctival papillae and scleral ossicles after hydrocortisone treatment. Developmental Biology. 1973, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 223-227. KING, AS. and MCLELLAND, J. Birds: their struture and function. London: Bailliere Tindal, 1984. References LEMMRICH, W. Der Skleralring der vogel. Jenaische Zeitschrift fur Naturwis. 1931, vol. 65, p. 513-586. COULOMBRE, AJ. and COULOMBRE, JL. The skeleton eye. Developmental Biology. 1973, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 257-267. LINDLEY, DM., HATHCOCK, JT., MILLER, WW. et al. Fractured scleral ossicles in a red tail hawk. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. 1988, vol. 29, no. 5, p. 209-212. CURTIS, EL. and MILLER, RC. The sclerotic ring in North American birds. The Auk. 1938, vol. 55, no. 3, p. 225-243. DAVIS, DD. and GORE, UR. Clearing and staining skeleton of small vertebrates. Field Museum of Natural History. 1936, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 3-15. MACHECHA, GAB. and OLIVEIRA, CA. An additional bone in the sclera of the eyes of owls and the common potoo (Nictibius griseus) and its role in the contraction of the nictitating membrane. Acta Anatômica. 1998, vol. 163, no. 4, p. 201-211. DONOGHUE, PCJ., FOREY, PL. and ALDRIDGE, R. Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny. Biology Review. 2000, vol. 75, no. 2, p. 191-251. MAISEY, JG. Heads and tails: a chosdate phylogeny. Cladistics. 1986, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 201-256. EAMES, BF., de la FUENT, L. and HELMS, JA. Molecular ontogeny of the skeleton. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today. 2003, vol. 69, p. 93-101. MODESTO, SP. and ANDERSON, JS. The phylogenetic definition of reptilia. Systematic Biology. 2004, vol. 53, no. 5, p. 815-821. EAMES, BF. and HELMS, JA. Conserved molecular program regulating cranial and appendicular skeletogenesis. Developmental Dynamics. 2004, vol. 231, no. 1, p. 4-13. OSTROM, JH. Cranial morphology of the Hadrosaurian dinosaurs of North America. Bulletin of the British Museum - Natural History. 1961, vol. 122, no. 2, p. 33-186. FRANZ-ODENDAAL, TA. Intramembranous ossification of scleral ossicles in Chelydra serpentina. Zoology. 2005, vol. 109, no. 1, p. 75-81. PINTO, CB. and HALL, BK. Toward an understanding of the epithelial requirement for osteogenesis in scleral mesenchyme of the embryonic chick. Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1991, vol. 259, no. 2, p. 92-108. FRANZ-ODENDAAL, evolutionary and developmental trends. The Anatomical Record. 2008, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 161-168. TA. Scleral Ossicles of Teleostei: QUEIROZ, K. and GOOD, DA. The sclera ossicles of Opisthocomus and their phylogenetic significance. The Auk. 1988, vol. 105, p. 29-35. FRANZ-ODENDAAL, TA. and HALL, BK. Skeletal elements within teleost eyes and a discussion of their homology. Journal of Morphology 2006, vol. 267, no. 11, p. 1326-1337. ROMER, AS. Osteology of the reptiles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956. FRANZ-ODENDAAL, TA. and VICKARYOUS, MK. Skeletal elements in the vertebrate eye and adnexa: morphological and developmental perspectives. Developmental Dynamics. 2006, vol. 235, no. 5, p. 1244-1255. UNDERWOOD, G. The eye. In GANS, C. Biology of the reptilia. London: Academic Press, 1970. p. 1-98. VIEIRA, LG., SANTOS, ALQ. and LIMA, FC. Ontogeny of scleral ossicles of giant amazon river turtle Podocnemis expansa Schweigger, 1812 (Testudines, Podocnemididae). Brazilian Journal of Morphological Science. 2007, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 220-223. GALTON, PM. The ornithischian dinosaur Hypsilophodon from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight. Bulletin of the British Museum - Natural History. 1974, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 1-152. HALL, BK. Specificity in the differentiation and morphogenesis of neural-crest-derived sclera ossicles and of epithelial sclera papillae in the eye of the embryonic chick. Journal of Embryology & Experimental Morphology. 1981, vol. 66, p. 175-190. WARHEIT, KI., GOOD, DA. and QUEIROZ, K. Variation in numbers of scleral ossicles and their phylogenetic transformations within the pelicaniformes. The Auk. 1989, vol. 106, no. 3, p. 383-388. HALL, BK. and MIYAKE, T. The membranous skeleton: the role of cell condensation in vertebrate skeletogenesis. Anatomy and Embryology. 1992, vol. 186, no. 2, p. 107-124. WELLNHOFER, P. Das funfte skelettexemplar von Archaeopteryx. Palaeontographica. 1974, vol. 147, p. 169-216. HEILMANN, G. The origin of birds. London: H. F. & G. Witherby, 1926. Received May 19, 2009 Accepted January 8, 2010 HILDEBRAND, M. and GOSLOW, GE. Análise da estrutura dos vertebrados. São Paulo: Atheneu, 2006. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci., 2009, vol. 26, no. 3-4, p. 165-169 169