Patterns of Psoriatic Arthritis - PDF Document

Presentation Transcript

  1. ORIGINAL ARTICLE Patterns of Psoriatic Arthritis Amer Ejaz1, Arshi Iftikhar1and Nadia Iftikhar2 ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the clinical patterns of arthritis in psoriasis. Study Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Kharian Cantonment, Pakistan, from January to December 2007. Methodology: One hundred consecutive patients with psoriasis reporting to dermatology outpatient department were included. Pregnant ladies (due to X-ray hazard) and rheumatoid factor positive patients were excluded. The demographic profile of patients was recorded. Psoriatic arthritis was diagnosed on the basis of Moll and Wright criteria. Standardized examination of axial and peripheral joints was made. The severity of psoriasis was assessed by PASI score. The presence of a clinical type of psoriatic arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and nail changes were noted. X-ray films of involved joints were taken. A statistical analysis using chi-square test and student’s t-test were done where applicable. Results: The mean age of patients was 39.8+15.8 years. Seventy one percent were males and 29% were females. Forty six percent of the patients gave a history of joint involvement and fulfilled the Moll and Wright criteria. The mean PASI score in non-arthritic patients was 26.8+34.8 and in psoriatic arthritis patients it was 28.4+41.2, p=0.08. Thirteen patients (28.2%) had predominantly axial disease, while the rest had predominantly peripheral disease. Single joint involvement (monoarthritis) was the commonest clinical presentation. Nail involvement was seen in 29% of the patients without arthritis while in patients having arthritis, nail involvement was 74% (p=0.001). Conclusion: Joint involvement is common in psoriatic patients. However, the criteria of diagnosis lack consensus. Key words: Psoriasis. Psoriatic arthritis. Moll and Wright criteria. INTRODUCTION more in Indian ethnicity as compared to Chinese and other oriental races.9Studies addressing development of arthritis in psoriatics in Pakistani population are few and may suggest a different clinical pattern.10 Systematic reviews have also found widely variable disease frequency among different populations.11The purpose of the present study was to describe the clinical patterns of joint involvement in psoriatic patients at a dermatology clinic. Psoriasis is a common skin condition, which is known to affect about 1-2% of the world population.1Psoriatic arthritis is a known extracutaneous complication of psoriasis, which has variably been reported to affect 5-40% of psoriasis patients.1-4 Psoriatic arthritis has a variable clinical picture, which has led to some difficulties in classification of the disease.5 By and large, the Moll and Wright’s classification is agreed upon while several others have been proposed.6 The clinical spectrum of psoriatic arthritis has been recently extended by newly described entities such as pustulosis palmoplantaris with osteoarthritis sterno-clavicularis, psoriatic onycho- pachydermoperiostitis, enthesopathy and osteo- periostitis.7,8 METHODOLOGY This cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital Kharian Cantonment from January to December 2007. Written informed consent was taken from all the participating patients or their parents. The medical ethics and scientific committee of the hospital approved the study. One hundred consecutive patients with psoriasis reporting to the dermatology outpatient were included in the study. Pregnant ladies (due to X-ray hazard) and patients with positive rheumatoid factor were excluded. Patients giving history of joint pains were assessed on the basis of Moll and Wright criteria for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.12 The demographic profile of the patients was noted and their detailed history regarding onset of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, duration of arthritis, mode of onset (defined as the joints involved Studies describing the clinical patterns of psoriatic arthritis in Asian population are few. It has been suggested that the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis is 1Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Kharian Cantt. 2 Department of Dermatology, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Correspondence: Dr. Amer Ejaz, Department of Dermatology, Combined Military Hospital, Kharian Cantt. E-mail: Received June 20, 2008; accepted May 05, 2009. 553 Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2009, Vol. 19 (9): 553-556

  2. Amer Ejaz, Arshi Iftikhar and Nadia Iftikhar within the first three months of symptoms), nail dystrophy, dactylitis and enthesitis was recorded. A standardized examination of peripheral and axial joint involvement was made. The severity of psoriasis was noted on the basis of Psoriatic Activity and Severity Index (PASI) score. Nails were assessed for the presence of pitting, onycholysis, hyperkeratosis, and severe nail deformity with involvement of both sides of nails. Patients were classified into a clinical type on the basis of predominant joint involvement. The definition of various clinical forms of psoriatic arthritis was made as oligoarthritis (less than 5 joints involved); distal interphalangeal Predominant (DIP) joint (> 50% of joints involved were DIP joints); axial disease predominant (presence of a history of inflammatory back or neck pain and/or reduced cervical, thoracic or lumbar movements and radiographic sacroiliitis with involvement of less than 5 peripheral joints); symmetric (> 50% of joints grouping small joints of hands and feet, involved as matched pairs) and a arthritis mutilans (involvement of multiple joints with deformities).13 Dactylitis was diagnosed by a typical history or on clinical examination. A diagnosis of enthesitis was accepted if there was a history of inflammatory pain at an enthesial site or clinical evidence of enthesitis on examination. X-ray films of hands, feet, sacroiliac joints, and any other involved joints were taken in all patients. The presence of joint surface erosion was considered diagnostic of joint disease. Axial joint involvement was diagnosed on X-ray finding of syndesmophyte formation at any spinal level or sacroiliitis. The data was recorded on a detailed performa filled for each patient. Later, the data was transferred to statistical program SPSS version 12.0. Descriptive statistics and frequencies were calculated for age, gender, clinical type of psoriasis, and type of psoriatic arthritis. Statistical significance was considered at a level of 95% confidence interval, p-value was considered significant at the level of < 0.05. PASI score in arthritic and non-arthritic patients was compared using student’s t-test. The presence or absence of nail involvement in arthritic patients was compared using chi-square test. score in non-arthritic patients was 26.8 (SD +34.8) and in psoriatic arthritis patients it was 28.4 (SD +41.2, p=0.08). Forty six percent patients gave a history of joint involvement and fulfilled the Moll and Wright criteria but only 33% had radiological evidence of arthritis. Out of the 46 patients diagnosed as suffering from psoriatic arthritis, 13 (28.2%) had only axial disease, while the rest had peripheral disease or peripheral plus axial involvement. Single joint involvement (monoarthritis) was the commonest clinical presentation (Table I) and arthritis mutilans was not seen in any patient. The knee joint was the commonest joint involved (76% of patients suffered from knee joint involvement), whereas ankle joint involvement was found in only 28% of patients. Nail involvement was 29% in non-arthritic patients while in patients with arthritis nail involvement was 74% (p=0.001). Table I: Clinical patterns of joint involvement. Types of joint involvement a. Clinical pattern Single joint involvement Multiple joint involvement Axial joint involvement b. Clinical pattern according to Moll and Wright criteria Symmetric Oligoarthritis Axial Classical (DIP) c. Anatomical pattern Ankle joint Knee joint Elbow Spine Shoulder Metacarpal Distal interphalangeal CI=Confidence interval; DIP=Distal interphalangeal Frequency Percentage CI 95% 24 9 13 52.2 19.6 28.2 37.1 to 66.8% 9.9 to 34.4% 16.4 to 43.7% 14 16 13 3 30.4 34.7 28.2 6.5 13 35 16 19 16 14 14 28.3 76.1 34.8 41.3 34.8 30.4 30.4 16.4 to 43.7% 60.9 to 86.9% 21.8 to 50.3% 27.3 to 56.7% 21.8 to 50.3% 18.2 to 45.9% 18.2 to 45.9% DISCUSSION The Moll and Wright criteria for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis is the simplest and most frequently used for research. It includes presence of inflammatory arthritis, presence of psoriasis and absence of rheumatoid factor. Several modifications to this criteria have been proposed. It has been suggested that due to the simplicity of diagnosing arthritis some cases of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis may be erroneously diagnosed as psoriatic arthritis.12Since then, many more stringent classifications and diagnostic criteria have been put forward.6 The high number of joint involvement in psoriatics seen in this study was partly due to lax inclusion criteria but also partly due to high incidence of joint involvement in Asians as shown by other researchers.9,10Further studies are suggested in this regard using new criteria. This study shows a preponderance of psoriasis in men. Earlier studies in Caucasians generally show equal RESULTS One hundred patients were analyzed. Their mean age was 39.8 years (SD +15.8, SEM 1.95, range 5-75 years). The commonest age group was 31-45 years (40%), whereas < 15 years (7%) was the least common age group. Seventy one percent were males and 29% were females. Eighty eight percent patients had plaque psoriasis, 8% had guttate, and 4% had erythrodermic psoriasis. There was no case of pustular psoriasis. Mean percentage of body area involvement was 15.53 (SD +20.74, SEM 2.07, range 1-95%). Overall mean PASI score was 27.5 (SD +42.5, SEM 4.2). Mean PASI 554 Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2009, Vol. 19 (9): 553-556

  3. Patterns of psoriatic arthritis gender incidence, but a higher incidence of psoriasis in males has been suggested in Asians.14Whether this is due to better male access to medical facilities in Asian societies or a true male preponderance remains to be decided. The severity of psoriasis has traditionally been associated with the development of joint disease.1Many researchers have confirmed the finding of a higher PASI score in psoriatic arthritis.15On the other hand, some other studies have suggested no association between the severity of skin disease and the development of joint disease.4,16 The present study also suggests no association between disease severity and development of joint disease. In this regard, some researchers have argued about the limitations of PASI score in fully analyzing the skin condition of psoriatics and changes in the instrument have been recommended.15,17Further research is required with better validated psoriasis severity instruments to confirm the present findings. In this study, predominant axial involvement was found in 13% patients. Review of literature reveals somewhat similar figures in earlier studies. Studies on psoriatic arthritis in Asian patients show a similar percentage of axial involvement.13,18 However, studies on the Caucasian population show higher figures of axial joint involvement.5,19The current literature provides enough evidence of difference in the pattern of axial disease between Asians and Caucasians to warrant further research in this regard. Regarding peripheral joint involvement, earlier studies on Asian patients have shown oligoarthritis to be the most common clinical type.10,13Others have shown symmetric polyarthritis as the commonest clinical type.17 On the other hand, some studies on Caucasian patients show symmetrical polyarthritis as the dominant clinical group while others show oligoarthritis as the predominant clinical type.5,20,21The present study has shown oligoarthritis as the predominant clinical type. We believe the current knowledge does not clearly show a dominant clinical type of psoriatic arthritis and further population-based studies are needed. Nail disease is known to have a strong association with psoriatic arthritis. Prasad et al., found nail changes in 72.5% of their patients. 14In addition, study exclusively done on nail changes in psoriasis, on Caucasian population has reported statistically significant nail involvement with psoriatic arthritis as well as severity of psoriasis.22The evidence associating nail disease with joint involvement, especially DIP joints, is overwhelming and significant in Asians as well as Caucasian populations. A limitation of the present study is the small sample size, depicted by the large standard deviations in these results. Also, this study was conducted in a dermatology unit in hospital; therefore, it is not representative of a whole population. However, it can generate interest in further research in this neglected field. The study of psoriatic arthritis has lagged behind the study of other arthropathies. Noticeable differences in clinical patterns of joint involvement are found between Asians and Caucasian populations. However, the criteria used for diagnosis are confusing and lack consensus. Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis may be a significant confounder. We suggest larger, multi-centre, or population-based studies using more stringent criteria to assess the true frequency of arthritis in psoriatic patients. CONCLUSION Joint involvement is common in psoriatic patients. However, the criteria of diagnosis lack consensus. REFERENCES 1. Brent LH. Inflammatory arthritis: an overview for primary care physicians. Postgrad Med 2009; 121:148-62. 2. Zachariae H. Prevalence of joint disease in patients with psoriasis: implications for therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4: 441-7. 3. Mease PJ. Psoriatic arthritis update. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2006; 64: 25-31. 4. Ho PY, Barton A, Worthington J, Thomson W, Silman AJ, Bruce IN. HLA-Cw6 and HLA-DRB1*07 together are associated with less severe joint disease in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66; 807-11. 5. Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. Dermatol Ther 2009; 22:40-55. 6. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwel P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H. CASPAR study group. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54:2665-73. comment in Artritis Rheum 2007; 56:699-700. 7. Wilson FC, Icen M, Crowson CS, McEvoy MT, Gabriel SE, Kremers HM. Time trends in epidemiology and characteristics of psoriatic arthritis over 3 decades: a population-based study. J Rheumatol 2009; 36:361-7. comment in J Rheumatol 2009; 36: 213-5. 8. Sadek HA, Abdel-Nasser AM, El-Amawy TA, Hassan SZ. Rheumatic manifestations of psoriasis. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 488-98. 9. Thumboo J, Tham SN, Tay YK, Chee T, Mow B, Chia HP, et al. Patterns of psoriatic arthritis in Orientals. J Rheumatol 1997; 24:1949-53. 10. Ahmed TJ, Naseema K, Huma AA. Patterns of joint involvement in psoriasis: an observational study in local population. J Pak Assoc Dermatol 1998; 8:22-8. 11. Alamanos Y, Voulqari PV, Drosos AA. Incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2008; 35:1354-8. 12. Helliwell PS, Taylor WJ. Classification and diagnostic criteria for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (Suppl II): ii3-8. 13. Helliwell PS, Hetthen J, Sokoll K, Green M, Marchesoni A, Lubrano E, et al. Joint symmetry in early and late rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis: comparison with a mathematical model. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:865-71. 555 Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2009, Vol. 19 (9): 553-556

  4. Amer Ejaz, Arshi Iftikhar and Nadia Iftikhar 14. Prasad PVS, Bikku B, Kaviarasan PK, Senthilnathan A. A clinical study of psoriatic arthropathy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007; 73:166-70. 19. Pavlica L, Peric-Hajzler Z, Jovelic A, Seklar B, Damjanovic M. Psoriatic arthritis: a retrospective study of 162 patients. Vojnosanit Pregl 2005; 62:613-20. Comment in: Vojnosanit Pregl 2005; 62: 949-50. 15. Jamshidi F, Bouzari N, Seirafi H, Farnaghi F, Firooz A. The prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in psoriatic patients in Tehran, Iran. Arch Iran Med 2008; 11:162-5. 20. McHugh NJ, Balachrishnan C, Jones SM. Progression of peripheral joint disease in psoriatic arthritis: a 5-year prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42:778-83. 16. Jones SM, Armas JB, Cohen MG, Lovell CR, Evison G, McHugh NJ. Psoriatic arthritis: outcome of disease subsets and relationship of joint disease to nail and skin disease. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33:834-9. 21. Kane D, Stafford L, Bresnihan B, Fitzgerald O. A classification study of clinical subsets in an inception cohort of early psoriatic peripheral arthritis-DIP or not DIP revisited. Rheumatology 2003; 42:1469-76. 17. Jacobson CC, Kimball AB. Rethinking the psoriasis area and severity index: the impact of area should be increased. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151:381-7. 22. Williamsom L, Dalbeth N, Dockerty JL, Gee BC, Weatherall R, Wordsworth BP. Extended report: nail disease in psoriatic arthritis-clinically important, potentially treatable and often overlooked. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 790-4. Comment in: Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43:690-1. 18. Rajendran CP, Ledge SG, Rani KP, Madhavan R. Psoriatic arthritis. J Assoc Physicians India 2003; 51:1065-8. G G G G G*G G G G G 556 Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2009, Vol. 19 (9): 553-556