"Global Governance of Science: Understanding the Creeping Agenda and Making Recommendations"

This report, authored by a diverse group of experts from South Africa, Norway, the USA, Denmark, Latvia, China, Germany, and the UK,

Uploaded on Apr 24, 2023 | 1 Views
mikkelnielsen

About "Global Governance of Science: Understanding the Creeping Agenda and Making Recommendations"

PowerPoint presentation about '"Global Governance of Science: Understanding the Creeping Agenda and Making Recommendations"'. This presentation describes the topic on This report, authored by a diverse group of experts from South Africa, Norway, the USA, Denmark, Latvia, China, Germany, and the UK,. The key topics included in this slideshow are . Download this presentation absolutely free.

Presentation Transcript

Slide1The Report : Its Background and Recommendations

Slide2The authors Pamela Andanda – South Africa  Matthias Kaiser – Norway  Carl Mitcham – USA  Linda Nielsen – Denmark  Žaneta Ozoliņa – Latvia  Ren-Zong Qiu – China  Nico Stehr – Germany  Jack Stilgoe - UK

Slide3What drives global governanceof science?  Creeping global agenda – multi-level, multi- dimensional  Pressing national agenda  Intsitutionalism  International regime – laws, codes, norms  Growing networks  Economic pressure s – challenges for growth

Slide4What drives global governanceof science?  Transnationalism – innovation, technologies, brain - drain, circulation, bridges  Politics pressure on science and science pressure on politics  Expansion of interdisciplinarity  Science as a common international good  Ethics

Slide5How the Report approachesglobal governance?  Global governance is about change  Change of actors  Change of resources  Change of methods  Change of relations (society and science, science and politcs, science and scientists)  Change of priority settings

Slide6How the Report approachesgovernance?  Governance - as innovative practices of networks or horizontal forms of interaction, in which actors (political and non-political), arrive at mutually acceptable decisions.  Governance is needed for providing, distributing; regulating

Slide7Six Recommendations #1 Within the society of science, ethical governance should be promoted.  #2 Scientists should be encouraged to be self-critical.  #3 Scientists should adopt open access publication protocols.

Slide8Six Recommendations #4 ERA research projects should seek ways to enact fundamental human rights.  #5 ERA research should promote critical reflection on the ends as well as the means of science.

Slide9Six Recommendations #6 EU should seek opportunities to exercise global leadership in harmonizing the internal and external governance of science across national borders.